Page 128 - C.T. Loo A paper about his impact and activities in the Chinese art Market
P. 128

128

                       its Western counterparts. 276  Important innovations in Chinese art were necessarily


                       induced by outside forces that could be traced to the West. Chinese art was evaluated

                       according to Western aesthetic standards and the evolutional pattern in Western art


                       history. The following sections examine Loo’s construction of the Westernness of

                       Chinese art in terms of origination, developmental pattern, aesthetics, and categorization.


                                                       Origination Mystique

                            One of the most debated questions in the study of Chinese art has been where did it


                       come from? In Loo’s time, Western scholars generally held that certain peculiar features

                       or drastic changes in Chinese art could not be explained by native sources. Michael


                       Rostovtzeff  in the catalogue Inlaid Bronzes of the Han Dynasty in the Collection of C. T.

                       Loo observed, “We understand pretty well that the art of the Han period is more than a

                       natural outgrowth of the art of the preceding period. It is evident that none of the


                       peculiarities of the art of the Han period can be explained in this way.”(Rostovtzeff 1927,

                       3) In the similar line, Alfred Salmony in the catalogue Sino-Siberian Art in the Collection


                       of C. T. Loo stated, “…certain objects which are not sufficiently explained by the artistic

                                                         277
                       development of the Far East alone”  (Salmony 1933,1). In their search for the origin of





                       276  Scholars like Anada Coomaraswamy challenged this Eurocentric ideology in the
                       reception of Asian art (Coomaraswamy 1981).
                       277
                          The tendency of looking for outside influences on Chinese art was also manifested in
                       the study of ancient pottery and bronzes. Referring to the Anderson finds in Gansu in the
                       1920s, Alfred Salmony noted, “It has been frequently suggested, and with good reason,
                       that the painted pottery of China must in some way be connected with that of the
                       Mediterranean coast or of southeastern Europe.” (Salmony 1933, 4) In the field of
                       bronze, William Watson suggested, “The sudden appearance in China of accomplished
                       metallurgy might indicate the main elements of Shang culture came to China from
                       outside in an already developed form…”(Watson 1960, 11)
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133