Page 214 - The colours of each piece: production and consumption of Chinese enamelled porcelain, c.1728-c.1780
P. 214

CHAPTER  6  A  New  Context  of  Porcelain  Trade  1760-1770


                        supercargo’s report, referring to a ‘completely white piece in order to be painted here


                        (Canton)’  to  support  the  idea  that  Canton  was  capable  of  producing  enamelled

                                 5
                        porcelain.   However, the latter evidence was dated 1772, which was two decades

                                                    6
                        later than those white pieces.   Such evidences could also be interpreted to mean that
                        those undecorated pieces were not intended to be enamelled at Canton, but for selling

                        as final products, or for decorating in the Netherlands. Helen Espir has shown in her


                        comprehensive study on European decorated Chinese porcelain that, as early as 1720,

                                                                                                7
                        the Dutch painter had already started to paint enamel on Chinese porcelain.

                            Moreover,  the  existence  of  enamel  porcelain  workshops  in  the  1740s  is  not

                        supported by the data collected from VOC and EEIC trade records, which shows no


                                                                                                   8
                        evidence of the growth of imported pieces of enamelled porcelain in the 1740s.   Only
                        in the late 1750s did the quantities of exported pieces of enamelled porcelain at Canton


                        increase explicitly. I will show this in the following sections of this chapter.

                            According to private trade records, such as the data on armorial porcelain, whose

                                                                                       9
                        armorial porcelain was imported in growing numbers in the 1750s,   it could be argued

                        that Canton might have established workshops on enamelled porcelain production in

                        the 1750s. However, even if there was an enamelled porcelain workshop in the 1750s,


                        the production scale would not be as big as Hickey had observed.

                            Questions  follow  from  the  undeniable  evidence  that  Canton  was  becoming  a


                        crucial player in producing enamelled porcelain in the 1760s. How was this possible


                        5   Ibid.
                        6   Jörg, Porcelain and the Dutch Trade, p.353, note 131.
                        7   Helen Espir, European Decoration on Oriental Porcelain 1700-1830 (London, 2005), p.151.
                        This book is by far the most comprehensive study on this subject. Hellen is a collector and an
                        independent collector of Chinese export porcelain.
                        8   See the previous chapter: Chapter 5.
                        9   The number of armorial services reached its peak during the 1750s. See, David Howard, Chinese
                        Armorial  Porcelain  (London:  Faber  and  Faber  Limited,  1974),  pp.106-107;  David  Howard,
                        Chinese Armorial Porcelain (Heirloom & Howard Ltd., 2003), p.75.
                                                                                                      198
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219