Page 30 - Met Museum Export Porcelain 2003
P. 30

32. Plate.Chinese(Englishmarket)c, a.i739-43.Hardpaste.Diam.9 in.               privatetrade, which might be presumed to
(22.9 cm). HelenaWoolworthMcCannCollection,PurchaseG, ift of Winfield           mirrorWestern artistic conventions, is elusive,
Foundation, by exchange, 1978(1978.196)                                         there being surprisingly few exact correspon-
                                                                                dences between export forms and decora-
Apatternfor thisplatesurvivest,heonlycompletdeesignfor anarmoriaslervicetobe    tions and European prototypes. This invites
recordeIdt.wasmadeforLeakeOkeoverw, hosearmsareimpaledwiththoseofhis            attention to the origins of designs, how they
wife,MaryNichol;theirconjoinemd onogramL,MO,appearisn cartouchoesnthe           were conveyed, and whether Chinese painters
rim. Theservicewas shippedfromCantonin two installmentsin I74o and I743.        played any role in the interpretationof
Invoicesreferonlytoplatesanddishesa, ndthislimitationt,ogethewr iththerichness  Western style. Documentation of the private
ofthedecorationsu, ggesttshattheywereintendedmorefordisplaythanforuse.          trade is almost entirely lacking;that of the
                                                                                bulktrade is still quite one-sided. There are
Theunattributeddesignis identifiedonthereversaesa "Patterfnor China"c;lumsily,  important gaps in the English East India
howeveri,t ispaintedonbuff-tonedpapesro,thatthewhiteflowerisn thedrawing        Company records between 1705 and 1711
hadtobecoloredin theporcelaintobeefectiveonthewhiteground                       and again between 1754 and 1774, and those
                                                                                of the Swedish company were regularly
                                                                                destroyed after triennial audits. Only the
                                                                                records of the VOC,which are extensive, have
                                                                                been systematically explored, and they pre-
                                                                                sumably reflect the practices of its competi-
                                                                                tors as well. Fromthem we find that from

                                                                                about 1634 to at least 1793 the VOCconsis-

                                                                                tently provided examples of desired shapes,
                                                                                either in the form of three-dimensionalsamples
                                                                                and models or, after 1729, as drawings sent
                                                                                out each season to be reproduced in porcelain:
                                                                                usefulness was the primarygoal.

                                                                                   Of what must have been thousands of

                                                                                drawings (they were supplied in duplicate)
                                                                                only seven sheets from a single season, 1758,
                                                                                survive, depicting designs for tea and milk
                                                                                pots, fish dishes, cups and tureens, vases and
                                                                                cuspidors. Such drawings were part of the
                                                                                VOC'sannual "Requirements"and accompa-
                                                                                nied written instructions, which survive and
                                                                                are more than guides to the conservative
                                                                                managerial practices of an East Indiacom-
                                                                                pany; absent porcelains that are (rarely)dated
                                                                                or are datable by circumstance of underwater
                                                                                archaeology or heraldic specificity, these
                                                                                "Requirements"provide an essential insight
                                                                                into the seasonal changes in Europeantaste.
                                                                                As to decoration, VOCrecords indicate that

32
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35