Page 50 - Irving Collection Part II Chinese Art
P. 50

I
              L A C Q U E R  •  J A D E  •  B R O N Z E  •  I N K  T H E R V I N G  C O L L E C T I O N  髹金飾玉 - 歐雲伉儷珍藏



















              This fgure dates from the Angkor Wat period, in the twelfth century,   Many four-armed male fgures from the Angkor Wat period depict the
              when the Khmer Empire was at its territorial zenith. This starts with   Hindu god Vishnu, unsurprisingly, given the religious beliefs of Suryavarman
              the reign of Suryavarman II (r. 1113-1145), who ordered the construction   II. Towards the end of the twelfth century, images of Lokeshvara
              of Angkor Wat, the largest temple of the Angkor period, dedicated to   (Avalokiteshvara) and other Buddhist deities began to proliferate.
              Vishnu. The last great king of the period, Jayavarman VII (r. 1181-1218),   Representations of Vishnu and Lokeshvara during this time are almost
              expanded into the territories of the Champa to the east. Jayavarman VII   stylistically indistinguishable, save for their iconographic features. It is
              also adopted Mahayana Buddhism as the oficial state religion, replacing   likely the artists of the later Angkor Wat period adopted the iconometry of
              the cult of Vishnu which had predominated in the Khmer Empire for   Vishnu images when developing representations of Buddhist deities. See,
              previous centuries.                                   for example, a sandstone fgure of Lokeshvara from the Robert Hatfeld
                                                                    Ellsworth Collection, sold at Christie’s, New York, 17 March 2015, lot 36.
              Stylistically, the sculpture of the Angkor Wat period is marked by a return   The image can only be identifed by the presence of the diminutive Amitabha
              to the somewhat angular and upright modeling of the periods preceding   efigy at the front of the chignon, as the other iconographic markers which
              the Baphuon style of the eleventh century. This angularity can be seen in   would have been held in the four arms are missing. In the present fgure,
              the wide shoulders and hips of the upper torso, as well as in the drapery   there is a small triangular, shaped loss in the same place that could once
              of the sampot, which sits roughly straight across the hips, and in the   have been an Amitabha image. The only remaining iconographic identifer
              fsh-tail folds which fall in heavy vertical pleats, in contrast to the earlier   is the object held in the proper left upper hand, although it is not entirely
              Baphuon period in which the drapery is full of curling fourishes. The   legible. While it could be a fragmentary representation of the conch shell, an
              size of sculpture from the Angkor Wat period, however, is generally in   identifer of Vishnu, the horizontal striations on either end possibly indicate it
              line with the more diminutive Baphuon-period works, in contrast to the   could be a sutra manuscript, which is an attribute of Lokeshvara.
              monumental sculpture of the tenth century and earlier.













































      48      P A R T  I I
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55