Page 136 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 136

119



                       Ying’s textual explanations of the manufacturing process, Zheng Tinggui’s comments

                       and the visual content in the fourteen woodblock prints of Jingdezhen Tao lu convey


                       porcelain as a Jingdezhen-specific product.  Compared to the Qianlong court paintings,

                       Tao lu’s woodblock prints display an emphasis on the geographical location of the


                       porcelain production process: the Jingdezhen locale. The Jingdezhen emphasis manifests

                       itself in the differences between the sequence and content of the first few images.  The


                       Qianlong-commissioned set, Taoye tu, begins immediately with the technical process: the

                       first leaves of the album portray stone collection and then clay fabrication.  The Taoye tu


                       album ends with an illustration of the production of court ritual vessels.  In Zheng’s Tao

                       lu woodblock sequence, the first two illustrations are respectively a print of a Jingdezhen


                       city map and an image of the spatial layout of the imperial kiln (Figure 11).  By revising

                       and adding a map of Jingdezhen to the original set of visual images and the imperial kiln

                       depot (yuyao chang ੿ᇉᅀ), Zheng’s woodblock set enables audiences to see the


                       geographical location and its significance as a producer of imperial objects first before


                       viewers see steps of the porcelain production process.  Zheng’s ordering of visual prints

                       brings to the fore Jingdezhen as the site of porcelain manufacturing.


                              The placement of an image of the imperial kiln depot as the second illustration in

                       this opening set of prints also reinforces the idea that Jingdezhen porcelain and


                       Jingdezhen’s significance stemmed from its relationship to the court and various imperial

                       usages: tribute, ritual, or decorative.  Zheng makes no pretense to originality and

                       acknowledges forthrightly his debt to Tang Ying’s explanations at the end of the chapter.


                       His addition of the imperial kiln depot illustration at the beginning of his book

                       consequently impresses upon readers and viewers that porcelain from Jingdezhen derived
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141