Page 191 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 191

174




                       1
                        Percival David, “Hsiang and His Album,” Transactions of the Oriental Ceramic Society
                       11 (1933-1934): 22.

                       2  Stacey Pierson, Collectors, Collections, and Museums: The Field of Chinese Ceramics
                       in Britain, 1560-1960 (London: Peter Lang, 2007).

                       3
                        Stacey Pierson points out that the Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, which
                       opened in 1950, was the only museum completely centered on Chinese ceramics in
                       Britain and the only academic institution where the history of Chinese ceramics can be
                       studied at degree level.  See the pivotal role David played in the promulgation of popular
                       understanding of Chinese porcelain in her book that recounts his personal and
                       professional history in Collectors, Collections, and Museums (2007).   The foundation
                       has since then shut down.

                       4  Percival David, “Hsiang and His Album,” 22.

                       5
                        I use singular in the sense of art work that is valued from the perspective of the viewer
                       or beholder as something that is unique and relatedly, authentic.  The idea that a piece of
                       Art that should not able to be reproduced is prevalent in most modern aesthetic thinking
                       after Kant, and the reproducibility of art is most carefully considered in Walter
                       Benjamin’s essay, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” written in
                       1936.  See also John Berger, Ways of Seeing (London: Penguin Books, 1972). Walter
                       Benjamin, an important theorist of art and cultural history (of Europe), observed the
                       effect of film and other such technologies of mechanical reproduction as photography on
                       art’s experience.  Included in the shift from handicraft and manual production of works of
                       art to mechanical methods, he notes a diminution of the singularity of an artwork, since
                       mechanically reproduced works such as prints render the need for “authenticity”
                       irrelevant.  Whereas before, the artwork was valued as an object of cult value, the work is
                       now appreciated for its “exhibition value.”  An artwork’s exhibition value draws attention
                       away from the artwork’s privileged entity to the space between the viewer and the
                       artwork.

                       6  Lothar Ledderose, Ten Thousand Things: Module and Mass Production in Chinese Art
                       (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), 98.

                       7
                        I stress the visual here because the dissertation attempts to probe theoretically and
                       historically, the negotiations between the visual and material aspects of perceptions about
                       porcelain.  The nineteenth century, for instance, saw an increasing interest in glaze
                       technology and the proliferation of color terminology through the confluence of
                       collecting, museum practices, and French, Japanese, and English language research, in
                       understanding, appreciating, and authenticating porcelain.   Painters in France worked in
                       tandem with the same chemists who were developing color theories based on their
                       research into glazes sent from Jingdezhen.  Broadening the scope of nineteenth century
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196