Page 219 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 219

202



                       zhuanke xuexiao) located in Jingdezhen.  Wu noted that Tao Ya was, among other works,

                                                                   15
                       “a necessary reference for ceramic historians.”   Another scholarly work published in

                       1936 entitled Jingdezhen ciye shi (History of the Jingdezhen Ceramic Industry) by Jiang

                       Siqing also relied on Tao Ya to narrate the apex of ceramics development during the


                                               16
                       Ming and Qing dynasties.   Passages taken from Tao Ya informed readers of Jingdezhen
                       ciye shi about aspects of porcelain including the development and existence of


                       multicolored decoration on Ming-Qing ceramics, the throwing of porcelain bodies, and

                       copper inlays.   In 1959 an English translation was published.  Translated by an


                       independent ceramics scholar Geoffrey Sayer, it is terminologically vague and meant for

                                      17
                       specialists only.   As the only English translation, Sayer’s work is invaluable, but his

                       straightforward translation does not consider history or the fact that translation itself is

                                18
                       historical.   For instance, it consistently renders “qing” as “blue/green” to explain visual
                       phenomenon of ceramic glazes.  The invariable usage of the term, “blue/green” is


                       altogether limiting and misleading given the wide range of hues that fall under the color

                       “qing.”  Sayer’s translation does harm to the word qing which accounts for the vagaries


                       of the glaze due to its chemical oxidization process.  Considering the way in which qing

                       appeared in Ming dynasty (fifteenth and sixteenth centuries) texts, it encompasses an


                                                                 19
                       entire genre of ceramics, not simply a color.   It is thus difficult to gauge the application
                       of the original Tao Ya by reading Sayer’s book.


                              Insofar as the multiple printed editions and references to Tao Ya point to its

                       significance in the writing of historical surveys and in the discourses of modern antique


                       circles, Tao Ya can be said to have played an important role in the development of

                       modern histories of porcelain as Chinese art in the era of national art.  But its
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224