Page 241 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 241

224



                       hitherto been privately stored can be understood.  An aesthetic understanding of porcelain

                       was a part of a person’s social and moral being.  Chen also held favorable views toward a


                       book that similarly placed utmost value on collecting porcelain and the collector’s

                       knowledge about the history of porcelain: the Xiang Yuanbian illustrated manual.   As I


                       have discussed earlier, in Tao Ya, the Lidai mingci tupu (Illustrated Catalogue of

                       Porcelains of Successive Dynasties) was the focus of much praise and Tao Ya aspired to


                       be its successor.

                              At the same time that Chen was announcing and celebrating the social roles of the


                       collector, English collectors pointed to an image of the Chinese collector as one of the

                                                                                                          81
                       key indicators of authenticity, an emerging standard for porcelain collectors in Britain.

                       As mentioned, the late 1880s and 1890s saw the rise of a new standard by which

                       collectors in England chose porcelain.  With the looted objects from imperial collections

                       available for consumption by foreigners and antique dealers in Beijing, there emerged an


                       idea of authenticity based on a late nineteenth century concept of Chinese taste.  One

                       could presumably access authentic taste by understanding the Chinese collector.  Bushell


                       commented in his essay on the significance of the Xiang album:

                                     The Chinese collector is an antiquarian first and cares more
                                     for an incense-pot, dulled by centuries of war, than for the
                                     most brilliantly decorated of the vases in which we delight.
                                     The objects are often ugly enough, but it is impossible to
                                     get a notion of the progress of the ceramic art without some
                                     acquaintance with them. In the absence of specimens, some
                                     help may be got from figures, and the main purpose of my
                                     paper is to bring before the notice of the Society an
                                     illustrated manuscript catalogue, in four volumes by a
                                     collector of the sixteenth century of our era, who has drawn
                                     in colour and described eighty-two explanations of the
                                                                82
                                     different kinds of porcelain.
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246