Page 80 - 2019 October Important Chinese Art Sotheby's Hong Kong
P. 80

fig. 1
                                Blue and white ‘Indian lotus’ fruit bowl, mark and period of Xuande
                                formerly in the Tianminlou collection
                                Sotheby’s Hong Kong, 3rd April 2019, lot 7
                                圖一
                                明宣德 青花纏枝番蓮大盌 《大明宣德年製》款
                                天民樓舊藏
                                香港蘇富比2019年4月3日,編號7






           On account of the bowl’s solid potting, several ideas have   Chinese Ceramics. Selected articles from Orientations 1982-
           been put forward regarding its use. Dice playing has been   1998, Hong Kong, 1999, pp. 102-115, p. 106.
           suggested since some bowls show unusual wear on the   An identical bowl is in the National Palace Museum in
           interior. The bowl’s thick walls, plain white inside, would have   Taipei, included in the Museum’s exhibition Mingdai Xuande
           been a perfect battleground for cricket fighting, traditionally   guanyao jingcui tezhan tulu/ Catalogue of the Special
           a popular pastime in China. They may also have served   Exhibition of Selected Hsüan-te Imperial Porcelains of the
           as brush washers or as fruit bowls or simply have been   Ming Dynasty, Taipei, 1998, cat. no. 43; another bowl is
           multifunctional.
                                                     in the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, illustrated in Stuart
           Bowls of this shape were popular in their time and were   Young, ‘An Analysis of Chinese Blue and White’, Oriental Art,
           manufactured with a variety of designs, including composite   Summer 1956, New Series volume II, number 2, pl. 47, fig. 11,
           flower scrolls, fruiting sprigs, lingzhi, lotus with Buddhist   no. 36; a third example from the collection of C.T. Loo was
           emblems and the ‘three friends of winter’. Although mostly   included in the exhibition Ming Blue-and-White, Philadelphia
           known from the Xuande period, they were already produced   Museum Bulletin, 1949, no. 64, probably the same bowl
           earlier, in the Yongle period. For a precursor of this type   which was included in Chinese Ceramics from the Prehistoric
           of bowl, compare an unmarked example painted with a   Period through Ch’ien Lung’, Los Angeles Museum, Los
           beautiful rose design, illustrated in Regina Krahl, Chinese   Angeles, 1952, no. 281; and a fourth piece is illustrated in
           Ceramics from the Meiyintang Collection, London, 1994-  Sekai tōji zenshū: Ceramic Art of the World, vol. 14: Ming
           2010, vol. 4, no. 1654.                   Dynasty, Tokyo, 1976, pl. 150. At auction, a bowl from the
                                                     collection of J.M. Hu, was sold in our New York rooms, 4th
           While blue-and-white porcelain production was abundant,
           quality control was extremely strict. Tons of shards of   of June 1985, lot 6; another was sold in these rooms, 14th
                                                     November 1989, lot 19; a third example from the Tianminlou
           smashed pieces, deemed unsatisfactory, have been   collection was recently sold in these rooms, 3rd April 2019,
           uncovered at the imperial kiln site at Jingdezhen, see
           Jingdezhen Zhushan chutu Yongle Xuande guanyao ciqi   lot 7 (fig. 1).
           zhanlan/Imperial Porcelain of the Yongle and Xuande Periods   Two smaller bowls of the same pattern are in the National
           Excavated from the Site of the Ming Imperial Factory at   Palace Museum in Taipei, one included in Illustrated
           Jingdezhen, Hong Kong, 1989.              Catalogue of Ming Dynasty Porcelain, Taipei, 1977, no. 60;
                                                     the other in Porcelain of the National Palace Museum: Blue-
           Not surprisingly, Xuande porcelains became desirable   and-White Ware of the Ming Dynasty, book II (part 2), Hong
           collector’s items. Particularly during the late Ming period,
           they were regarded as status symbols, and were valuable   Kong, 1983, no. 46. A closely related bowl is also found in
           commodities in the contemporary art market. Literature on   the Palace Museum in Beijing, with a differently painted lotus
                                                     scroll, and florets at the foot and rim, illustrated in Geng
           connoisseurship invariably placed Xuande blue-and-white   Baochang, Gugong Bowuyuan cang Ming chu qinghua ci
           porcelain on top, before Chenghua, Jiajing and Wanli, see
           Clarence F. Shangraw, ‘Fifteenth Century Blue-and-White   [Early Ming blue-and-white porcelain in the Palace Museum],
           Porcelain in the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco’,   Beijing, 2002, vol. 2, pl. 141, together with a bowl decorated
                                                     with lingzhi, pl. 140.



           78       SOTHEBY ’S        IMPORTANT CHINESE ART
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85