Page 39 - Sothebys Important Chinese Art April 3 2018
P. 39

This narcissus bowl radiates the essence of Jun ware which   The form of this bowl, also known as ‘drum nail’ basins,
                            derived its beauty from their robust forms which were coated   belongs to a distinct group of flower receptacles known as
                            in a contrasting luminous thick glaze of varied moon-white   ‘numbered Jun’ wares, mostly made in moulds and generally
                            colouration that becomes almost transparent around the   inscribed on the base with numerals from one to ten that seem
                            edges of the vessel where the glaze thins significantly. On the   to correspond to the size of the vessels. The dating of these
                            present bowl the glossy glaze is reminiscent of a hazy blue sky,   wares has been long debated and continues to divide opinions
                            infused with the characteristic markings that have become   between a Northern Song (960-1127), late Yuan (1279-1368)
                            known as ‘earthworm tracks’.              and early Ming (1368-1644) attribution.
                            Highly prized throughout Chinese dynastic history since their   The Northern Song date, adhered to by many eminent Chinese
                            production, these striking vessels were produced in a variety   scholars, was supported by a surface find near the kiln sites
                            of proportions and glaze colours and are found in some of the   of a mould fragment for coins bearing the Xuanhe reign name
                            most important museums and private collections of Chinese   (1119-1125), made of Jun ware clay. However, at scholarly
                            art. Bowls of this type also incised with the character san   conferences on the subject in Yuzhou in 2005 and in Shenzhen
                            (three), include two deep-lavender glazed examples, in the   in 2006 the date of the coin mould itself has come under
                            National Palace Museum, Taipei, published in A Panorama   scrutiny and was basically discredited, since it was shown
                            of Ceramics in the Collection of the National Palace Museum:   not to be a mould for actual coins of that period and to bear a
                            Chun Ware, Taipei, 1999, pls 32 and 33, together with further   spurious reign mark of an even earlier period on the reverse.
                            examples inscribed with different numbers, pls 27-31 and   Scientific tests of sherds undertaken by the Shanghai Museum
                            34-36; and another, from the collection of Captain Vivian   have pointed to a late Yuan or early Ming date. A newly
                            Bulkeley-Johnson, The Mount Trust, sold twice at Christie’s   discovered Jun ewer very similar in shape to a gold ewer from
                            Hong Kong in 1991 and 1996, again in our London rooms in   the tomb of King Zhuang of Liang, buried in 1441, has also been
                            2003, and a fourth time in our New York rooms, 23rd March   offered as evidence for a later dating.
                            2011, lot 514.
                                                                      Since a large body of ‘numbered Jun’ wares remains in
                            Further bowls of this type, in the Palace Museum, Beijing, are   the Chinese imperial collection both in the National Palace
                            illustrated in Selection of Jun Ware. The Palace Museum’s   Museum, Taipei, and the Palace Museum, Beijing, often
                            Collection and Archaeological Excavation, Beijing, 2013, pls   inscribed after firing with the names of Palace halls, a Yuan
                            94-96, 113, 115 and 116, together with fragments excavated   date seems less likely, as virtually no Yuan ceramics formed
                            from the kiln site, pls 97-98 and one excavated in Yuzhou city   part of the Qing court collection. The production of these
                            (pl. 114 and p. 343, figs 12-1 and 12-2); and another, incised   flower vessels fits better into the early Ming dynasty, and they
                            with the numeral si (four) from the Dr W. Kilgenberg and Reach   may well have been officially commissioned for the newly built
                            Family collections, included in the exhibition Chinese Art from   imperial palace in Beijing in the Yongle period (1403-1424).
                            the Reach Family Collection, Eskenazi, London, 1989, cat. no.   Furthermore, these vessels do not appear in any pre-Ming text
                            24, sold at Christie’s Hong Kong, 28th April 1997, lot 696,   or painting, and their form is similar to early Ming celadon-
                            again in these rooms, 2nd May 2000, lot 590, and a third time   glazed flower vessels, such as one included in the exhibition
                            in our London rooms, 11th November 2015, lot 81. See also   Xuande Imperial Porcelain Excavated at Jingdezhen, Chang
                            a blue-glazed bowl from the T.Y. Chao collection, sold in our   Foundation, Taipei, 1998, cat. no. 39.
                            Hong Kong rooms, 19th May 1987, lot 210.



































                                                                                      IMPORTANT CHINESE ART  37
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44