Page 43 - DUOKOPT BIBLIOBOOK
P. 43

EASY HANDLING









             4                                                       European Journal of Ophthalmology 0(0)


             Table 2. Overall patient satisfaction.    Table 3. Patient satisfaction of use.
             Question         Answer         Total     Question         Answer          Total
             Overall, how would  n           762       Is the delivery system  n        782
              you rate the delivery  Same, better or  598 (78.4%)  bottle easy to open?  Very easy or easy  590 (75.5%)
              system compared to  much better                           Difficult or very  192 (24.5%)
              your previous eye  Less or much less  164 (21.5%)           difficult
              drop?
                                                       How do you consider  n           783
             Overall, are you satis-  n      784        the handling of the  Very easy or easy  599 (76.5%)
              fied with the deliv-  Satisfied or very  614 (78.3 %)  delivery system?  Difficult or very  184 (23.5%)
              ery system bottle?  satisfied                               difficult
                              Unsatisfied or very  170 (21.7%)
                               unsatisfied             Is it easy to squeeze  n         784
                                                        and obtain the drop?  Very easy or easy  550 (70.2%)
             Based on your satis-  n         783                        Difficult or very  234 (29.8%)
              faction, are you  Yes or probably yes  648 (82.8%)          difficult
              going to carry on  No or probably no  135 (17.2%)
                                                       Is it easy to instil a  n        784
              using the delivery
              system?                                   drop with the deliv-  Very easy or easy  576 (73.5%)
                                                        ery system      Difficult or very  208 (26.5%)
                                                                          difficult

                                  V
               The modified QuickDASH questionnaire was com-
                                  R
             pleted by 268 patients: 79.1% had a score of [0 to 25[,  to open. Overall, 81.6% having previously used UD
             16.8% a score of [25 to 50[, 4.1% had a score of [50 to  and 74.4% having previously used MD eye drops
             75[, and none of the patients had a score of [75 to 100].  assessed the test delivery system as easy to very easy
               VA data were available for 685 patients, of those  to handle. Squeezing and obtaining a drop was the
             47.9% had normal vision (�0.8), 33.3% had mild  same or was easier compared to their previous UD
             vision loss (0.3–0.8) and 18.9% had moderate to  treatment for 79.3% and for 58.5% who previously
             severe vision loss (<0.3) in the worse eye.  used MD delivery systems (Table 4).
                                                         The univariate logistic regression model showed that
             Patient satisfaction                      both age-related disease such as dexterity issues and
             Overall satisfaction.                     type of previously used delivery systems impacted
             In total, 78.4% of the patients rated the tested MDDS  patient satisfaction (both p � 0.05) significantly.
             as good, better or much better than their previous
             delivery system, 78.3% were satisfied or very satisfied  Impact of dexterity on patient satisfaction
             with the tested delivery system and 82.8% stated that  There were more patients with a QuickDASH V R
             they would continue or probably continue using the  (n ¼ 211), score between [0 to 25[ (66.4%) and [50 to
             tested delivery system (Table 2).         75[ (81.8%), that rated the tested delivery system easy
                                                       or very easy to open (p � 0.05), and significantly more
             Overall satisfaction of use.              subjects in the [0 to 25[ (72%) score group rated the
             When asked, 75.5% of the patients declared being sat-  tested delivery system as the same, better or much
             isfied or very satisfied with the easiness of opening and  better than their previous device (p � 0.05). Even
             76.5% stated that the tested MDDS was easy or very  though there was no statistically significant difference
             easy to handle. Overall, 70.2% indicated that squeezing  for handling, squeezing, obtaining a drop and instilla-
             and obtaining a drop with the tested MDDS was the  tion, all patients except those in the group [25 to 50[
             same as or easier compared to previous glaucoma treat-  for squeezing and obtaining a drop stated that the
             ments, and 73.5% reported that the drop was easy or  tested MDDS was easier or much easier to use
             very easy to instil (Table 3).
                                                       (Table 5).
             Satisfaction of patients having previously used UD or MD  Impact of level of VA on patient satisfaction
             delivery systems.
             A total of 84.5% of the patients having previously used  Overall 78.3% of patients (614, all p < 0.01) rated the
             UD and 71.3% having previously used MD delivery  tested MDDS as same, better or much better than their
             systems rated the tested MDDS as easy or very easy  previous  dispensing  device.  Even  though  not










                                                                                                                   43
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48