Page 19 - EVOLUTION OF THE SUDAN PEOPLE’S LIBERATION MOVEMENT(SPLM),
P. 19

CHAPTER TWO

                                               LITERATURE REVIEW





          2.1 Empirical Literature

          Studies on the evolution and development of South Sudan have been conducted by historians and other

          social science scholars under three interrelated themes: Egypt and its involvement in the Sudan, the problem
          of South Sudan and lastly, the extent of Sudanese participation in their own administration (Muddathir
          Abdal Rahim, 1969). After Mohamed Ali became the governor of Egypt in 1805, he expanded Egyptian
          and Ottoman influence along the Mediterranean and the Sudan, thereby establishing the Turko Egyptian

          centralized administration and rule between 1821 and 1879.Studies undertaken are thus largely historical
          and focusedon the imperial expansion in the Sudan, especially the expansion into Sudan and South Sudan
          for markets and commodities such as gold, ivory and agriculture.

           The Turko Egyptian rule subdued and occupied new territories such as Kassala, Equatorial, Bahr El Ghazal,

          and Darfur in 1874(Richard, H, 1959).  The Mahdi revolt of 1885-1898 established the Islamic state against
          Turkish rule. The Mahdi resistance planted early seeds of Sudanese nationalism even though he was never
          accepted or recognized in South Sudan as a legitimate leader. The condominium rule under British and
          Egyptian administrators failed to administer effectively or retard the growing forces of nationalism to the

          extent that British agreed to political independence in 1956.  Thus, modern Sudanese nationalism lacked
          coherence or glue to hold people together and was immediately contested by the forces of secession and
          nationalism in South Sudan after the Torit revolt and Anyanya I resistance.

          The South Sudan question emerged as the most central question at independence and one that could not

          immediately be resolved and took over a quarter a century of civil war and the signing of the comprehensive
          peace agreement.  Literature on Sudan and South Sudan was studied under four sub-headings- imperial
          occupation, nationalist resistance, civil war and post-independence thematic areas of research. Imperialism,

          war and decolonization have remained the most researched. The historical research has been undertaken by
          Francis Deng, Douglas Johnson and Richard Hill among others and their conclusions reflect their nationalist
          and anti-imperialist stand at the time.

          The research on national liberation struggle have largely focused on the manner in which the

          struggle was conducted, the justification of the struggle, heroic and sacrifices that informed
          the struggle but very little has been done with regards to heritage of the national liberation
          struggle and the type of societies that emerge in the post liberation dispensation. Studies on post
          liberation societies have been conducted in the past but largely in Southern Africa- Zimbabwe,
          Mozambique, Namibia,  Angola, Eritrea, and South  Africa and all have concluded that there

          is a tendency towards authoritarianism, corruption, arrogance and oppression once liberation
          movements capture state power (Wallenstein, 1996).

          Fanon (1974) observed that the general tendency has been to adopt an economic policy that leans

          towards neocolonialism.  Post liberation governments face complex and multiple challenges
          as compared to liberation movements.  Whereas liberation movements move in solidarity of

                                                           13
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24