Page 12 - AfrElec Week 11 2021
P. 12

AfrElec                                     NEWS IN BRIEF                                             AfrElec








       COAL                                Environmental Justice                  South32, which is headquartered in Perth,
                                             “The problem with our system is that   initiated new coal supply contract discussions
       Local residents protest             corporates are allowed to do as they please.   with Eskom in terms of a hardship clause
                                                                                in the WMC-Duvha agreement. South32
                                           Mining companies violate the rights of
       against Ikwezi Coal Mine;s          the poor with impunity because they are   has long said that the Duvha contract is
                                                                                lossmaking and that exports from WMC
                                           bigger than the law.” Robby Mokgalaka,
       Kliprand colliery                   groundWork’s coal campaigner.        cross-subsidise the portion of the mine’s
                                                                                domestic production.
                                             On 01 June, 2018, the Department of
       Local communities in Newcastle South   Mineral Resources suspended Ikwezi Mine’s   The negotiation of the contract is especially
       Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal Province are   license owing to its unlawful failure to comply   important as South32 is in the final stages of
       protesting against Australian-owned Ikwezi   with the social and labour plan despite   selling WMC, and its other South African
       Coal Mine of refusing to take responsibility   having had the mining rights for six years,   mines, to Seriti Resources.
       for the impacts from its mining operations.  and how the mine transgressed the approved   The upshot of the new coal supply
         Residents in the communities of Kliprand   environmental management programme by   agreement is that Eskom will make
       farm, Cloneen, Kàlvlakte, Jan Farm and   tampering with graves.t         preparations to supply Duvha with coal from
       Dragan Farm are accusing the company,   GROUNDWORK                       lower cost alternatives over time. As a result,
       which operates the opencast coal mine, of                                the WMC supply contract will be extended
       abusing and bullying the communities.                                    four years to about 2024 but not to its fullest
         The protestors say that public health is   COAL                        extent which is contained in an option
       being affected at Kliprand Farm by coal dust                             agreement to 2034.
       caused by the mine and trucks, and that   ESKOM to pursue with
       blasting at the mine is damaging houses.
         They also say that the company is secretive   South32 coal supply talks
       and unhelpful, claiming that the project’s                               CORRUPTION
       Social Labour Plan (SLP) is not a public   ESKOM is to submit a new proposal for the
       document and does not serve the needs of   supply of coal from South32’s Wolvekrans   AfDB sanctions Mitsubishi
       local people.                       Middelburg Complex (WMC) mine in
         They also claim that all labour is   Mpumalanga province to its Duvha power   Heavy Industries for Ltd. for
       outsourced, that local livestock is dying   station, Eskom CEO André de Ruyter said,
       in numbers because they are grazing   BusinessLive reported. A previous proposal   sanctionable practice
       grass covered with coal dust and that   was rejected by South Africa’s National
       mine management refuses to engage with   Treasury. The treasury vets all major   The African Development Bank (AfDB) has
       community members.                  expenditure undertaken by Eskom as a   issued a sanction decision against Mitsubishi
         The current protest follows similar events   safeguard after a period of overspend by the   Heavy Industries for misrepresentation during
       in December, when the community handed   utility which has contributed to more than   a tender to build a power plant in Egypt.
       over a memorandum to mine management.   ZAR450bn in crippling debt.        This matter arises in the context of the Abu
       All the issues raised in that protest are yet   “The application that we made to National   Qir 1300 MW Steam Power Project in Egypt.
       to be resolved and there has not been any   Treasury didn’t receive a positive response.   On 15 January 2008, the Bank entered into
       engagement with the community.      It has therefore become moot,” said De   a loan agreement with the Arab Republic of
         “Enough is enough, we’re not going back   Ruyter. “We are however preparing another   Egypt to finance part of the Project which had
       to the regime where mines exploited our   application to National Treasury for an   a broad objective of improving the electricity
       resources, destroyed our land and left us   extension of the contract period by further   supply in Egypt. MHI, as part of a consortium,
       dumps, contaminated water and sick people.   four years with an increase in the contract   submitted a bid and was awarded the contract.
       Ikwezi mine must take responsibility for their   price.                    The African Development Bank considers
       harm on our well-being and the environment.”   “This is a significantly smaller application,”   there is sufficient evidence to support a
       Themba Khumalo, Secretary of Sukumani   he said.                         finding that it is more likely than not that
                                                                                MHI engaged in sanctionable practices
                                                                                (misrepresentation) in the context of Abu Qir
                                                                                tender and contract implementation.
                                                                                  In consideration of the above and in the
                                                                                absence of any aggravating factor, AfDB
                                                                                decided to issue a Letter of Reprimand
                                                                                against MHI in line with Section 11.2 (a)
                                                                                of the Sanctions Procedures of the African
                                                                                Development Bank Group.
                                                                                  The Office of Integrity and Anti-
                                                                                Corruption of the African Development Bank
                                                                                Group is responsible for preventing, deterring
                                                                                and investigating allegations of corruption,
                                                                                fraud and other sanctionable practices in
                                                                                Bank Group-financed operations.
                                                                                AFDB


       P12                                      www. NEWSBASE .com                          Week 11  18•March•2021
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16