Page 5 - AfrOil Week 50 2022
P. 5

AfrOil                                       COMMENTARY                                                AfrOil


                         Additionally, it requires companies to develop   by forcing a major oil company to give up a
                         and publish “vigilance plans” that identify the   high-profile project, no matter how much it
                         risks that their projects may pose to human   might benefit the countries involved, and would
                         rights or to the environment and describe con-  never be satisfied with any version of the vigi-
                         crete measures that can be taken to prevent   lance plan.
                         severe harm and mitigate such hazards in their
                         global operation. Separately, the companies in   Case not settled yet
                         question must commit to implementing these   It is, of course, too early to tell how this court
                         plans and disclose information on the metrics   case will play out. Three years have passed since
                         of their implementation in annual reports.  the environmental groups first filed suit against
                           The environmental groups have been argu-  TotalEnergies, and a great deal has changed
                         ing that TotalEnergies violated the law because   since then.
                         its 2019 vigilance plan was both inadequate and   On the one hand, TotalEnergies has consoli-
                         inadequately implemented. TotalEnergies, on   dated its holdings in the Tilenga fields. In Octo-
                         the other hand, has defended its plan – and has   ber 2019, when the suit was first filed, it was still
                         also pointed out that it drew up another, more   tangled up in negotiations with Tullow Oil (UK/
                         detailed plan in 2020. Additionally, it has argued   Ireland), the company that first discovered oil   TotalEnergies
                         that the plaintiffs are aiming at the wrong target,   near Lake Albert, on a farm-out deal that was
                         since LADP is actually being carried out by its   not settled until the spring of the following year.  has argued that
                         Ugandan subsidiary, TotalEnergies Uganda.  On the other hand, European energy mar-  the plaintiffs are
                                                              kets and energy policy have shifted because of
                         Moving forward                       the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Because this   aiming at the
                         In any event, the case is now moving forward   development has disrupted oil and gas flows
                         in the French civil court system, and it is slated   to Europe, many European officials are taking   wrong target,
                         to reach its next milestone at the end of next   a different approach to the environmental and   since the project
                         February.                            climate issues driving groups such as Friends of
                           In the meantime, Friends of the Earth and   the Earth and making decarbonisation a lower   is actually being
                         the other plaintiffs are repeating their standing   priority. (The UK, for example, has just approved
                         complaints against TotalEnergies, including   the opening of a new deep coal mine for the first   carried out by
                         their concerns about inadequate compensation   time in three decades.)
                         to owners of property along the EACOP pipeline   Of course, public policy won’t necessarily   its Ugandan
                         route. They are also ramping up their statements   decide the outcome of a court case. Neverthe-  subsidiary
                         of concern about the risk that the upstream and   less, other policy considerations may come into
                         midstream components of LADP pose to the   play as hearings move forward. There may be
                         environment and to the global climate.  debate, for instance, about whether and to what
                           For its part, TotalEnergies has signalled that it   extent a law that compels French companies to
                         does not intend to give up. RFI quoted Antonin   avoid land seizures applies to a foreign govern-
                         Lévy, a lawyer for the company, as saying earlier   ment working with a French company. (With
                         this month that he could have “spent five hours   respect to EACOP, the governments of Tanzania
                         denouncing the failings” and falsehoods of the   and Uganda have been appropriating the land
                         plaintiffs but would prefer to focus on “the inad-  needed to build the pipeline.)
                         missibility of their claim,” given that the project   In the meantime, perhaps the question is
                         is not being executed in France.     whether the lawsuit will have any impact on
                           He also alleged that the environmental   preparations to bring Tilenga and the EACOP
                         groups were trying to set a public precedent   link on stream in 2025. ™




























                              The environmental groups filed suit against the French major in October 2019 (Photo: Friends of the Earth)



       Week 50   15•December•2022               www. NEWSBASE .com                                              P5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10