Page 117 - Daniel
P. 117

passages that speak prophetically of Babylon and its overthrow (cf. Isa.
               13  and  14),  it  becomes  clear  that  the  contest  between  God  and
               Nebuchadnezzar is a broad illustration of God’s dealings with the human
               race and especially the Gentile world in its creaturely pride and failure

               to recognize God’s sovereignty.
                  The  theme  of  this  chapter,  as  given  by  Daniel  himself  in  the
               interpretation  of  the  king’s  dream,  is  God’s  dealings  with

               Nebuchadnezzar “till you know that the Most High rules the kingdom of
               men and gives it to whom he will” (v. 25). Alongside the demonstration
               of  God’s  sovereignty,  the  bankruptcy  of  Babylonian  wisdom  forms
               another  motif.  It  is  certainly  by  design  that  this  chapter  precedes  the
               downfall of Babylon itself in chapter 5. However, there is no justification
               in pushing this to the extreme of making it a particular application to
               Antiochus Epiphanes, in the effort to support a late date of Daniel. There

               is nothing whatever to link this passage to the second century B.C. In fact,
               it is far more applicable to that fateful night in October 539  B.C. when

               Babylon fell.
                  Whether chapter 4 was written by Nebuchadnezzar himself, or more
               probably  by  one  of  his  scribes  at  his  dictation,  or  possibly  by  Daniel
               himself  at  the  king’s  direction,  the  inclusion  of  it  here  is  by  divine

               inspiration. Those who reject this account assume that it is not inspired
               of  the  Holy  Spirit,  that  an  experience  like  Nebuchadnezzar’s  is
               essentially  incredible,  and  that  it  is  a  myth  rather  than  an  authentic
               historical record.

                  Such  objections  obviously  assume  that  higher  criticism  is  right  in
               declaring Daniel a forgery of the second century  B.C. This conclusion is
               subject  to  question  not  only  because  of  the  fallacious  reasoning  that

               supports it, but because it is challenged by the documentary evidence in
               the Qumran text of Daniel, which on the basis of the critics’ own criteria
               would  require  Daniel  to  be  much  older  than  the  second  century  (see
               additional discussion in chapter 3). Conservative scholarship has united
               in declaring this chapter a genuine portion of the Word of God, equally
               inspired as other sections of Daniel.




                INTRODUCTION OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR’S PROCLAMATION (4:1–3)
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122