Page 35 - Daniel
P. 35

book of Revelation. Its revelation of the sovereignty and power of God
               has brought assurance to Jew and Gentile alike that God will fulfill His
               sovereign purposes in time and eternity.




                                                          NOTES


                1  Cf. H. C. Leupold, Exposition of Daniel (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1949), 8.

                2  Ibid., 5–7. For details on the dating of Ezekiel’s prophecies, see Charles H. Dyer, “Ezekiel,” The
                  Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck, eds. (Wheaton,
                  IL: Victor Books, 1985), 1,224–25. Ezekiel’s first mention of Daniel, in chapter 14, took place
                  between September 17, 592 B.C. (8:1) and August 14, 591 B.C. (20:1). Daniel had already been

                  serving in the court of Nebuchadnezzar for about a decade when Ezekiel used him as an
                  example in this chapter.
                3  Robert Dick Wilson, “Book of Daniel,” International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, vol. 2, James

                  Orr, ed. (Chicago: Howard-Severance, 1930), 783.

                4  J. Barton Payne, “Book of Daniel,” Zondervan Pictorial Bible Dictionary, Merrill C. Tenney, ed.
                  (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1963), 198.
                5  Ralph Alexander, “Hermeneutics of Old Testament Apocalyptic Literature” (abstract, doctoral

                  diss., Dallas Theological Seminary, 1968), 1.

                6  Ibid. However, Miller argues for limiting those works identified as apocalyptic even further.
                  “An examination of the Old and New Testament canons reveals that only two books contain
                  material that conforms to the above criteria: the Book of Revelation and the Book of Daniel
                  (particularly chaps. 7–12). Therefore it seems best to limit the canonical apocalyptic material
                  to these two compositions.” Stephen R. Miller, Daniel, New American Commentary (Nashville:
                  Broadman & Holman, 2001), 46.

                7  Cf. H. H. Rowley, The Relevance of the Apocalyptic, 2nd ed. (London: Lutterworth, 1952), 29–
                  55; and Stanley B. Frost, Old Testament Apocalyptic (London: Epworth, 1952), 178–209.

                8  Cf. W. J. Martin, “Language of the Old Testament,” The New Bible Dictionary (Grand Rapids:
                  Eerdmans, 1962), 712–13.

                9  William H. Brownlee, The Meaning of the Qumran Scrolls for the Bible (New York: oxford, 1964),
                  36.

                10  S. R. Driver, The Book of Daniel (The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges. Cambridge:
                  Cambridge University Press, 1900), lix–lx.
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40