Page 20 - JOP2020_FINAL2.pf
P. 20

Methodology
            In evaluating the anophthalmic socket
            of any patient, particularly in an elderly
            patient, one must consider several fac-
            tors that will impact the final result. It is
            common to find problems with lower-lid
            laxity leading to retention issues and
            midline misalignment of the pupils on
            the horizontal plane; superior sulcus
            defects, which cause a hollow appear-
            ance of the superior sulcus; upper-lid
            laxity, which creates the need for a ptosis
            crutch; weight considerations, which
            exacerbate lower lid laxity as the weight   Figure 5. Ocular prosthetic modifications.
            of the prosthesis pushes the lower lid
            downward and out of position. In all, one must take
            into account the option of surgical intervention
            to correct these anatomical defects. The author’s
            experience with recommending that a patient
            attend a consultation with the referring physician to
            discuss possible surgical intervention has been, in
            the majority, negative. Elderly patients seem to be
            extremely reticent to have additional surgery and for
            the most part cannot afford even the copay.
              In this present case study, the author chose the
            standard-impression technique using an impression
            tray. The patient was asked to incline his head at a
            45-degree angle upward as the impression material
            was initially injected through the tube attached to
            the front of the impression tray. Then he was asked
            to slowly tilt his head down in a forward-looking
            position as the impression material set. It is stan-
            dard practice in the author’s experience to mix the
            impression material to a medium viscosity in these
            circumstances. The impression was cast using
            fast-set Jeltrate (Dentsply Sirona; Charlotte, North
            Carolina ), the impression was removed; the top and
            bottom portions of the mold were put back together;    Figure 6. Patient wearing the
            and the void was filled with Ivory Inlay Casting Wax   2018 custom ocular prosthesis.
            (Kerr Laboratory, Brea, California). Note that Ivory
            Inlay Casting Wax is recommended by the author
            because of its capacity to be easily carved as well as   the best cosmetic result would require some degree of
            its non-brittle properties.                       asymmetry between the natural and the artificial eyes.
              The wax model was trimmed, smoothed, and           It was suggested to the patient that a blepharo-
            inserted into the patient’s eye socket to be evaluated.   plasty procedure on the lower lid to raise the lid and
            It was determined that additional material would   position the prosthetic eye higher in the socket might
            need to be removed from the portion that extended   result in a higher degree of symmetry between it and
            into the lower fornix to allow the lower lid to slide   the companion eye. His response was to say that he
            upward. Due to the displacement of the adipose    had no interest in any type of surgical intervention.
            tissue and the overlying skin surrounding the eye   The author proceeded with modifications to the wax
            socket, eyelids, and cheek, it was determined that   model. Figure 5 shows a comparison, in silhouette, of

            18  |  SANDERS                                               JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC PROSTHETICS
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25