Page 70 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 70

surest way of having a lot of upside without being exposed to
                       unacceptable downside.

                          As  excited  as  we  were  about  this  new  approach,  we
                       proceeded cautiously. We gave the system a 10 percent weight

                       initially and it made money in nineteen of the twenty months
                       in  our  test  period.  As  we  got  more  confident,  I  decided  to
                       reach  out  to  a  select  group  of  investors  I  knew  well  about
                       investing in the strategy with $1 million trial accounts. I knew
                       that  asking  these  institutional  investors  to  invest  such
                       relatively modest amounts would make it hard for them to turn

                       us down. I called the new product “Top 5%” at first, because it
                       comprised  the  best  5  percent  of  our  decision  rules;  later  I
                       changed the name to Pure  Alpha to convey that it consisted
                       purely of alphas. Because Pure Alpha didn’t have any betas, it
                       didn’t have any bias to go up or down along with any market.
                       Its  returns  depended  only  on  how  good  we  were  in
                       outperforming others.


                          Our totally new “alpha overlay” approach allowed investors
                       to receive the return of their chosen asset class (the S&P 500
                       stock market, a bond index, commodities—whatever) plus the
                       return from the portfolio of bets that we were making across
                       all asset classes. As unprecedented as our approach was, we
                       explained  our  logic  carefully,  showing  why  it  was  actually
                       much less risky than traditional approaches. We also showed

                       them how we expected the cumulative performance to unfold
                       and  what  the  expected  range  of  performance  around  that
                       would be. For our clients, it was a bit like being presented with
                       the design of a plane that had never flown before but looked
                       radically better than any other plane on paper. Would anyone

                       be courageous enough to get on board?
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75