Page 86 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 86

exploring  differences.  But  eventually  I  found  a  few  great
                       people, especially a psychologist named Bob Eichinger, who
                       pointed me to a number of other very useful tests.

                          In early 2008, I had most of Bridgewater’s managers take

                       the  Myers-Briggs  assessment.  The  results  astounded  me.  I
                       couldn’t  believe  that  some  of  them  actually  thought  in  the
                       ways  the  test  described,  yet  when  I  asked  them  to  rate  how
                       well it described them on a scale of one to five, more than 80
                       percent of them gave it a four or five.




                             CREATING BASEBALL CARDS



                       Even  after  we  were  armed  with  the  Myers-Briggs  data  and
                       other tests we’d taken, I found that we were still having a hard

                       time connecting the dots between the outcomes that we were
                       seeing and what we knew about the people producing them.
                       Over  and  over  again,  the  same  people  would  walk  into  the
                       same  meetings,  do  things  the  same  ways,  and  get  the  same
                       results without seeking to understand why. (Recently I came
                       across a study that revealed a cognitive bias in which people

                       consistently overlook the evidence of one person being better
                       than  another  at  something  and  assume  that  both  are  equally
                       good at a task. This was  exactly what we  were seeing.) For
                       example,  people  who  were  known  not  to  be  creative  were
                       being  assigned  tasks  that  required  creativity;  people  who
                       didn’t pay attention to details were being assigned to detail-
                       oriented jobs, and so on. We needed a way to make the data

                       that  showed  what  people  were  like  even  clearer  and  more
                       explicit,  so  I  began  making  “Baseball  Cards”  for  employees
                       that listed their “stats.” The idea was that they could be passed
                       around and referred to when assigning responsibilities. Just as
                       you wouldn’t have a great fielder with a .160 batting average
                       bat  third,  you  wouldn’t  assign  a  big-picture  person  a  task

                       requiring attention to details.

                          At  first,  this  idea  met  a  lot  of  resistance.  People  were
                       concerned that the Baseball Cards wouldn’t be accurate, that
                       producing them would be too time-consuming, and that they
                       would only succeed in pigeonholing people unfairly. But over
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91