Page 32 - Biblical Counseling II-Textbook
P. 32

How do parent-infant attachment bonds form?
               “From birth, babies in all cultures are social creatures, developing an intense bond with their caregivers.
               Infants come to prefer familiar faces and voices, then to coo when given their mother’s or father’s
               attention. Soon after object permanence emerges and children become mobile, a curious thing
               happens. Object permanence is the awareness that things continue to exist even when not perceived.
               At about 8 months, they develop stranger anxiety which is the fear of strangers that infants commonly
               display around 8 months. They may greet strangers by crying and reaching for familiar caregivers. “No!
               Don’t leave me!” their distress seems to say. At about this age, children create schemas of familiar
               faces. A schema is a cognitive framework that helps organize and interpret information in the world
               around us.  When children cannot assimilate the new face into those remembered schemas, they
               become distressed. Once again, we see an important principle: the brain, mind, and social-emotional
               behavior develop together” (Myers, p. 75, 2009).

               Origins of Attachment
               “By 12 months, infants typically cling tightly to a parent when they are frightened or expect separation.
               Reunited after being separated, they shower the parent with smiles and hugs. Attachment is an
               emotional tie with another person. No social behavior is more striking than this intense and mutual
               infant-parent bond.  This attachment bond is a powerful survival impulse that keeps infants close to
               their caregivers. Infants become attached to those-typically their parents-who are comfortable and
               familiar. For many years, developmental psychologists reasoned that infants became attached to those
               who satisfied their need for nourishment. It made sense. But an accidental finding overturned this
               explanation” (Myers, p. 76, 2009). (photos:
               aviewfromtheright.com and justifiedgrid.com)










































                                                             31
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37