Page 14 - Unlikely Stories 4
P. 14

The Discontinuator



          “I’m serious. As soon as Einstein debunked absolute motion, no
        one cared further for the real substratum. It is there, it must be there,
        and it cannot be breached. Empiricism hit its limits in the search for
        subatomic  particles,  quantum  theory  dispensed  with  that  limit  by
        accepting a virtual level of reality into and out of which mass-energy
        mysteriously  appear.  That,  in  short,  is  just  another  name  for  the
        apeiron, and it is why the more logical among you accept that a finite
        vacuum does not and cannot coexist with non-vacuum. They grant
        that the real continuum  may be, metaphorically speaking, stretched
        thin in places like interstellar space, but it is never absent.”
          Killeton  dabbed  his  mouth  with  the  ten  centimeters  of  napkin
        provided with his barely plural course meal.
          “If, as you say, no vacuum occurs in nature, I hardly see that as
        preventing  one  from  being  created  with  the  right  application  of
        forces  against  even  the  smallest  constituent  of  existence.  My
        apparatus does not discriminate on the basis of size or duration—or,
        in fact, if virtuality is more than a semantic trick—on the ontological
        status of whatever is within the target hypersphere. And even if I fail,
        it does not prove the impossibility of what I tried to achieve: merely
        that the equipment available here and now isn’t powerful enough.”
          “Then  you  would  not  admit  that  the  real  continuum  and  a
        vacuum—any vacuum—are incompatible, physically if not logically?”
          “Admit  it?  What  is  this,  an  inquisition?”  The  professor  pushed
        back his chair and stood up.
          “Not at all, sir,” said Gregorian soothingly. “I’m sorry if I offended
        you. But now I can answer my first question: yes, there is a hazard, a
        danger of inconceivable finality. If your experiment fails because of
        its  design  or  physical  limitations,  that  would  merely  confirm  my
        opinion  that  it  had  to  fail.  If  it  fails  owing  to  its  inherent
        impossibility, I am equally unconcerned; and the difference between
        those  two  cases  is  irrelevant  to  me.  But  there  are  two  other
        possibilities:  first,  that  reality  is  metaphysically  dualistic.  That  is,
        nothing  can,  in  fact,  coexist  with  something,  via  a  boundary  that
        makes  no  sense—a  one-sided  edge.  That  would  have  profound
        implications.”
          “And I would be vindicated!”

                                       13
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19