Page 152 - Labelle Gramercy, On the Case
P. 152

Jury-rigged

        cheating in their underworld dealings. That led her to put the family
        under a microscope, sifting the forensic data and the Simulians’ alibis
        for something substantial enough to lead to an indictment. It turned
        out  that  Sherman  superstitiously  kept  his  nail  clippings  in  a  small
        silver casket for ultimate burial with the rest of his remains, and an
        extremely minute amount of match-head sulfur had adhered to one
        of those parings. Labelle, relying on the scientific expertise of a series
        of academic eggheads she spoon-fed to the D.A., was able to date
        that clipping based on the varying diet the Simulians ingested in their
        travels and to tie the precise chemical composition of the pyrosulfate
        to a specific box of matches purchased by Sherman the day before
        the crime.
          That box had been opened. Only one match had been removed, a
        conclusion based on an independent analysis of the manufacturer’s
        mechanical quantity and quality control and the dramatic opening of
        twenty similar boxes and counting of their contents in front of the
        jury. It was also scientifically demonstrated that the striking surface
        on the side of the box had not been used. Finally, Sherman’s habit of
        lighting matches with his thumbnail was established, and the account
        he had given of his whereabouts during the crucial time frame fell
        apart under Labelle’s systematic dissection.
          He  and  the  other  Simulians,  after  agreeing  on  a  date  and  time,
        evidently  drew  lots  to  determine  who  would  carry  out  an
        assassination; only the executioner thus chosen knew who would do
        the  killing,  so  it  would  be  impossible  for  the  others  to  reveal  his
        identity—period.  Further,  knowing  the  appointed  hour  permitted
        each to plan his alibi without involving any of the others. Sherman’s
        story seemed as airtight as his cohorts’—until Lieutenant Gramercy
        painstakingly punctured it. At the time of the murder he had been on
        an  overnight  train  to  another  city,  he  swore,  and  produced  the
        punched ticket as proof. The ticket seller remembered the heavyset
        man with a thick accent wearing a bright Hawaiian shirt, and so did
        the man at the wicket. The conductor testified that he punched all the
        tickets after the train left the station, and that it did not stop until six
        hours later at its final destination. Sherman said—and produced more
        witnesses, including fellow passengers and the same conductor—that
        he returned the next day, again retaining his ticket (a practice, he told
        the  judge  with  a  straight  face,  he  followed  in  order  to  produce

                                       151
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157