Page 159 - Psychoceramics and the Test of Fire
P. 159

Epilogue

        siphoning  off  money  into  their  own  accounts  for  years.  Magnus
        either  was  ignorant  of  that  embezzlement  or  chose  to  ignore  it  in
        order to maintain his belief in the Personnelyzer. I wonder what his
        response was when I defaulted on my agreement and not only gave
        up the final payment I desperately needed, but turned in his intended
        recipient to the FBI.
          An  important  flaw  in  his  theory  was  that  people  don’t  change.
        Somehow his background in the physical sciences distorted his vision
        of human nature. From his perspective, once an adult had settled into
        more or less fixed ways of being, that personality could be sampled as
        a constant constellation of variables more or less fitting a set of job
        requirements.  I  was  reminded  of  Isaac  Asimov’s  series  of  science
        fiction novels presenting the idea that a group of scientists, sensing
        that their high civilization was about to collapse into a millennium of
        barbarism, set up a secret organization following a plan which would,
        after a thousand years of secretly managing events, be able with one
        final manipulation to usher in a renaissance; that outrageous triumph
        of algorithmic predictability over the truly unforeseeable outcome of
        myriad events was a conceit of those books that somehow succeeded,
        owing to the author’s skill, in maintaining the reader’s suspension of
        disbelief in such a possibility.
          Al  Magnus’s  inability  to  turn  his  discovery  over  to  the  cold
        scrutiny of trained social scientists left him in a fool’s paradise. He
        missed  three  crucial  things.  First,  as  I  mentioned,  the  very
        circumstances of a position might alter its tenant’s personality enough
        to  make  him  unsuitable  for  the  task;  second,  also  mentioned,
        Magnus’s status as immediate and ongoing evaluator of his personnel
        decisions was subject to his own personal whims and fantasies—had
        he ever given  himself the  test?—and finally, it dawned on me, the
        very fact that he told his choices that they had been “scientifically”
        vetted would have an effect on them, for better or worse.
          In my case, it pumped me up enough to start the work and keep at
        it;  the  same  must  have  been  true  for  his  executives.  But  they  had
        been picked to some extent for their accounting skills; none having
        had such high-paying jobs in the past, temptation overcame whatever
        self-restraint the Personnelyzer had measured in them prior to being
        hired.  I  had  a  need  to  refresh  my  coffers  regularly  owing  to  my
                                       157
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161