Page 31 - Psychoceramics and the Test of Fire
P. 31

Archaeontogeny

        armpits up, a balding bull-necked bearded bright-eyed colossus in a
        Hawaiian shirt. He looked at me keenly.
          “You  sure  you’re  in  the  right  office?  Business  administration
        moved to Toad Hall about ten years ago.”
          He grinned at his pleasantry and I did, too, careful not to bare my
        incisors to the gum line. Better be on guard, I thought: this guy has
        seen a lot of people in a lot of places.
          “I  sure  hope  so,”  I  uttered  respectfully.  “You  are  Professor
        Eugene Cutter, are you not? I have—”
          “Call me Gene.”
          “—an appointment with you, sir. My name is Andrew Mann. The
        Charybdis  Foundation.”  I  approached  the  desk,  exuding
        unctuousness. “My card.”
          He took it, tossed it on the midden. “Okay. Now I know who you
        are. Hard to believe anyone is taking an interest in archaeontogeny.
        But I’m ready and willing to be a believer. Have a seat.”
          I would unbend as I bent to his will. Watch me transform into yet
        another adoring acolyte, Professor, I said to myself. But I had to pass
        a test somewhere along the line. Fortune favors the prepared mind.
          “Thank  you  for  taking  the  time  to  see  me  in  your  office,
        Professor.”
          “Call me Gene.”
          “Certainly,  Gene.  Why  don’t  you  call  me  Andy?  Well,  to  the
        matter  at  hand.  As  our  mission  statement  indicates,  we  have  an
        endowment  generating  income  to  be  disbursed  to  recognized
        authorities  in  psychology,  sociology  and  anthropology,  for  original
        research projects in their field. Although you did not directly apply
        for one of our grants, we are aware of your work and encourage you
        to do so.”
          He  knitted  his  brows,  with  enough  material  to  make  a  pair  of
        mittens.
          “What do you know about my work?”
          I  was  expecting  this  sort  of  torpedo,  and  knew  it  had  to  be
        defused with care. “We know about your past successes and failures,
        including  the ground-breaking  attempt  to  detect  panspermia  in  the
        genome.  As  far  as  we’re  concerned,  you  were  betrayed  by  bad
        computer support. But our board of directors—some of whom you
                                       29
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36