Page 32 - Psychoceramics and the Test of Fire
P. 32

Archaeontogeny

        know by reputation if not personally, both here and abroad—is more
        interested in your completely untested theory concerning early man
        and DNA.”
          “‘Completely untested.’ That sounds rather pejorative, Andy.”
          Time to kowtow. “Oh, no, not at all, Professor Gene—I mean,
        Cutter. When I said that, I meant it in a purely technical, objective
        sense. It’s not like we thought you would be releasing an unproven
        product on the public like a pesticide.”
          “We do have standards here at Runyoke, young man, as well as a
        professional commitment to the scientific method.” That was it; now
        he could relate to me. I tried to look properly chastened. In fact I had
        read nothing in the man’s record to commend his ethics, academic or
        otherwise.
          “I  would  not  be  sitting  here  if  I  thought  otherwise,”  I  meekly
        prevaricated.
          “Good.” Cutter donned a pair of thick glasses, picked up a binder
        on the corner of his desk and waved it at me. “This is the research
        design document for the Homo primitivus project. It has made the
        rounds of the grant-dispensing gods and been found wanting. Why is
        your outfit interested in it?”
          I hated these hurdles. But he had no reason not to be suspicious.
        It was my task to lead a very thirsty horse to water and make him
        drink.
          “Plainly  put,  Gene,  your  ideas  are  unique,  possibly  far  enough
        ahead of the curve to scare off Charybdis’s competitors. The sources
        of their money tend to be corporate, and that makes them excessively
        cautious. We are chartered by private donors bold enough to see the
        value  in  supporting  ideas  that  may  have  no  immediate  return  in
        commercial  terms—indeed  may  have  no  financially  exploitable
        expectations whatsoever.”
          He was mollified. “I didn’t know such an organization existed. I’ll
        give  you  a  few  minutes,  Andy.  Let’s  see  if  you  understand  what  I
        intend to prove.”
          “Please, Gene: I’ve no background in evolutionary biology, not to
        mention genetics. I read a summary of your theory prepared by our
        analysts. You intend to take up a neglected idea of the nineteenth-
        century naturalist, Ernst Haeckel, the law of biogenetics. You believe
                                       30
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37