Page 102 - The Myth and the Moment
P. 102

Evening

        hedonism or sensationalism is, of course, itself, a sort of mythology.
        Both types of myth, with and without moments, serve to buffer man
        against his mortal terror.”
          “So that’s how you see me: a born-again cynic, out to get what I
        can before the lights go out.”
          “Sorry, Ham, but you haven’t shown me any other side—until this
        current act of generosity, if such it be. But let me finish. Only in our
        era,  the  final  days  of  Western  Civilization,  has  a  philosophy  been
        formulated which resolves the tension between myth and moment.
        And  that  is  logical  positivism,  with  its  linguistic  analysis  and  strict
        empiricism. You may think it’s old hat, wiped out by the Nazis and
        post-modernism,  but  it’s  really  the  high  point  of  clear  thinking  in
        European history. In recent  years  the  myth-makers  have reasserted
        their authority in universities and the popular mind, so you don’t hear
        much  about  it.  Nevertheless,  I  have,  so  to  speak,  kept  the  faith.  I
        understand mythology within the context of the moment.”
          “You claiming you can live without any irrational beliefs?”
          “Yes. By avoiding both sorts of horror vacui: the insatiable search for
        pleasure and the unmollifiable fear of death. Nature provides us with
        both the information and the values necessary to live well; all we have
        to  do  is  accept  our  place  within  the  natural  world,  within  the
        spacetime continuum. That’s a radical view, but nothing more than
        enlightened  pragmatism,  really.  Belief  itself  is  a  phenomenon,  a
        repository  of  working  hypotheses  supported  by  statistically-
        significant empirically-verifiable assertions about the way things are—
        moment  to  moment.  Unlike  quantum  mechanics,  reality  on  the
        grosser levels will not provide many surprises, and that is the field of
        most human actions; of course, justification cannot be found for the
        anomalous  situations  that  must  occur  sporadically,  but  those  are
        specifically the living proof, so to speak, that the generally-applicable
        judgements can’t be based on absolutes or mythologies.”
          “I  don’t  know  if  I  can  dig  all  that  at  once,  Nate.  But  if,  as  you
        claim, you are living by some principles more advanced than the rest
        of us can formulate, what has it gotten you? No platform to preach
        from, barely a pot to piss in. Some two-bit hustler like Phil Kolpak
        just about puts you away in the nut-house. Cabbies on the Strip won’t
        give  you  a  second  look.  If  you  believe  so  strongly  in  all  this
        philosophy jive, why ain’t you out there pushing it?”

                                       101
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104