Page 114 - An Evening with Maxwell's Daemons
P. 114

“It’s a no-brainer.”

            “Certainly, AI has its critics and enemies: they see humanity up
          against the wall, on the verge of irrelevance and replacement. The
          highest-level  ruling  intelligence  may  have  contradictory  directives:
          save the planet and preserve humanity. No human can be certain
          which  priority  is  being  served  by  any  specific  instance  of  the
          system’s decisions. It is smart enough to be duplicitous; after all, we
          taught  it  that  the  ends  justify  the  means.  And  we  have  left  this
          super-brain to develop its own algorithms for evaluating courses of
          action,  confident  that  it  would  do  a  better  job  than  we  have  of
          running the world. Ethics and morality? We supplied them as input,
          maybe even gave them high values in the initial programming—but
          now we have no idea of their weight in calculations of such abstruse
          complexity  that  no  human  could  unwind  them.  All  that  the
          opponents of the system can do is yell, ‘It’s a no-brainer!’ whenever
          they judge that their affairs have been handled remotely by a clever
          computer instead of a low-wage, poorly-education human—or even
          a highly-trained professional person, for that matter. Scream, rant
          and rave, and hope others will realize that even the autonomy of the
          autocrats has been lost.”
            “My unresolved scenario, therefore, is the  evolution of such a
          popular movement and what the response of the system might be
          to it. That, in turn, relates to whatever chance you think we have of
          wresting control from universal AI once it has taken over. It seems
          like we always are looking over our shoulder at prospective readers,
          wondering if they are pessimists or optimists, and whether or not
          we  should  let  that  influence  the  resolution  of  crises  that—by
          dramatic  necessity—could  go  either  way.  Our  own  autonomy  as
          creative  artists  cannot  help  but  be  compromised  by  such
          considerations, but we are involved in oxymoronic commercial art
          and cannot ignore them. My tendency is to leave it unresolved, an
          outcome  perhaps  as  unlikely  as  the  reassertion  of  human  control
          over its creations. That may be optimistic, or simply an opening for
          sequels  if  the  first  story  is  successful.  What  do  you  think?  How
          would grass-roots resistance play out? It ultimately means finding a
          way to be smarter when you are not as smart.”
            Perversity Tinderstack wasted no time in responding.

                                        113
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119