Page 21 - faculty manual_2020-2021

theory is clearly mostly clear and Relationship between
articulated and complete, or has some theory and research is
accurate. minor errors. 5 – 7 pts unclear or inaccurate,
major errors in the
8– 10 pts
logic are present.

0 – 4 pts
Conclusions Conclusion is clearly Conclusion is clearly Conclusion may not be
stated and connections stated and connections clear and the
to the research and to research and position connections to the
position are clear and are mostly clear, some research are incorrect
relevant. The aspects may not be or unclear or just a
underlying logic is connected or minor repetition of the
explicit. errors in logic are findings without
present. 2-3 pts explanation.
4-5 pts
Underlying logic has
major flaws;
connection to position
is not clear.

Writing Paper is coherently Paper is generally well Paper is poorly
organized and the logic organized and most of organized and difficult
is easy to follow. There the argument is easy to to read – does not flow
are no spelling or follow. There are only a logically from one part
grammatical errors and few minor spelling or to another. There are
terminology is clearly grammatical errors, or several spelling and/or
defined. Writing is terms are not clearly grammatical errors;
clear and concise and defined. Writing is technical terms may not
persuasive. 4-5 pts mostly clear but may be defined or are poorly
lack conciseness. 2-3 defined. Writing lacks
pts clarity and conciseness.
0-1 pts

Formative Assessment for Class Participation

Exemplary Competent Developing Not compliant
(18-20 points) (16-17 points) (14-15 points) (1 point each)

Frequency Attends class Attends class Attends class Attends class
regularly and regularly and regularly but rarely regularly but
and
always contributes sometimes contributes to the never contributes
Quality to the discussion contributes to the discussion in the to the discussion
by raising discussion in the aforementioned in the
thoughtful ways.

20 Last updated 8/25/2020