Page 7 - 75_EMAIL 2017 CORRESPONDENCE to 7-4-17

From: Paul B_C studio@graffiti.biz Subject: End of the Affair
Date: 24 January 2017 at 16:55
To: Sigg - Hillgarth Michele mhillgarth@gmail.com
Bcc: Brown-Constable Paul Neville studio@graffiti.biz
Dear Michele, before you attempt further correspondence with anybody, I suggest you read carefully the various facts stated below. Why don’t you try telling the truth instead of, as usual, confusing other lessees with your rantings, as you are simply making yourself look even more totally stupid and incompetent and spiteful with the various accusations and demands you have made recently in your 23 January round-robin letter, namely:
You insist on an Audit for MHML accounts and supply the English Law clauses outlining your rights to do so, but forgetting that one of those clauses DENIES you the facility - yet you send it!!! Do you ever read anything properly? Do you even comprehend what you are supplying?
You insisted on seeing Service Charge Accounts not appreciating that any request must come within 6 months of their publication. Your request for 2014 was well outside of any 6 month limit yet you still continued to persist. How many more times must you be told. It’s the law, not my objection to supplying.
We offered to send the documents despite having no OBLIGATION to do so as your request was out of time. What happened - you totally ignored our offer!
Stupid or not on all three above? Add in the various other rubbish you dragged up in reams of correspondence in 2016, this email would run to 20 pages.
You’re awkward, venomous and dysfunctional, Michele, incompetent to a degree and ignorant beyond belief - you’re also a liar as has been well evidenced in emails and correspondence since mid 2011 as the above examples and your most recent letter of 23 January 2017 amply evidences, so please, no more queries as you will NOT receive a reply - from myself or anybody else you vainly attempt to involve or threaten with your paranoid fantasies.
We will not correspond with contrary lessees such as yourself who simply refuse to accept or comprehend responses and replies, with their own vitriolic agendas and certainly not lessees in breach of their lease covenants jeopardising the health and safety and of other lessees. One only has to peruse your recent 23 January letter for proof of your sloppy incompetent attention to detail and facts, as you can’t even state your correct Post Code (W8 7EH as opposed to what you have written, W8 7 E66) or indeed write a correct date (23 January 2017 as opposed to what you have written, 23 January 23 2017.)
All indicative of what our previous Agents endured from you for years and subsequently ourselves since the Auction on July 14 2011 - reams and reams of correspondence well evidence in detail your obtuseness, contrariness, incompetence and total ignorance of financial or economic common sense.
No more Michele - you’ve had every single query answered in detail since the 23 March 2016 letter (13pp) and had you had the professionalism and courtesy to respond to our initial offer to supply the 2014 Works’ invoices on 1st April 2016 (an offer we were not legally obliged to supply anyway), you would have been satisfied. But of course you would not, as has been well evidenced in subsequent correspondence outlining your lengthy list of other concerns accompanied by accusations and innuendos of every conceivable crime imaginable alongside vacuous threats of this that and the other.
in brief: (leaving aside regarding references to my alleged intimidation, blackmail, forging Solicitors letters and indecent exposure; the Fraud Squad for not having itemised Reserves Utilised to your satisfaction (or as you refer, misleading accounting, which, seeing as you have on file emails from myself reminding lessees including yourself that once the 2014 accounts are published they are at liberty to request all and any documents referencing the works budget - on top of which, of course, was our offer to comply to your request - both of which would tend to dispute misleading accounting if they could so easily have been perused) and purloining the lessees' Window Repairs monies (ludicrous lies...?); the Third Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) for having used Caribbean Sunset as opposed to Taupe in the "communal" areas and bronze (not gold as you refer) as opposed to black or dark grey on the lift!
i) were any Works executed over and above those Works stated in the Schedule of Works? ii) if they were, had they been quoted and costed by more than one supplier/contractor?
iii) were those same quotes and costs organised, arranged and identified as required by certain lessees including you?
iv) were those works discussed and agreed by some lessees including you and budgets prepared and advised to MHML for consideration by all lessees?