Page 5 - 22_PBC to Begg MH letter OCR_27-5-16 (7)

everybody’s day-to-day use. It is NOT and never has been and never will be - it’s a facility to be used when necessary such as building works, overnight storage - yes no problem parking a bike overnight but if it gets damaged, stolen, abused etc it’s down to the owner. The rear yard and environs are used by both shops either side of our- selves as their fire-escape, smoking zone, bar-b-ques etc - all very friendly we are with them too.
(reply) Mrs Hillgarth states: “It would not surprise me if we, the leaseholders, were paying for the extra electricity, heating and decoration of their office.”
Our valid comment: make up your mind as to whether we’re running an office from the basement or my flat? This is a typical Mrs Hillgarth innuendo to other lessees.
Interestingly, in the email to Flat 3 on 14 July 2015 @ 15.30h we also wrote: I thought you three flats (meaning Flats 3, 5 and 9) had given up and found someone else to harass, but it takes just one to set the whole gaggle off again. As Harold MacMillan, our famous British Prime Minister said years ago, You’ve Never Had It So Good.... and believe me, Maria, you haven’t!
And also interestingly, in the email to Flat 5 (Mrs Hillgarth) on 14 July 2015 @ 113.22h we also wrote: Your reference yesterday to my complaints etc are relatively unfounded and I imagine you are referring to when Flat 2 reported that your Flat 5 tenant held an open evening for an art exhibition with at least 20-30 strangers wandering about the building drinking and smoking outside our main front door alongside an open invitation poster on the entrance wall inviting anybody in to view... .. and you had the bare-faced cheek to say it was organised/governed/permissible and the building itself with it’s decor being arty should welcome it.....
No problem, I fully agree, the place is more like an art gallery than a Motel....
If you care to look at MHML's website, we will see that Mr PBC is the leading expert in UK in lease extensions. He claims "to form over 85% of all RTM companies" and had experience of handling collective freehold enfranchisement applications. MHML further state that it carried out £3 million of professional indemnity cover. Mr PBC and his Directors can hardly claim that he is only using the premises for "secretarial work"! If he was to claim the contrary I would accuse him of misleading the public and mis- representation.
On the subject of the website you might want to advise your client (who’s the client?) that plagiarising 100% of the content of a website of a bona fide property management company is illegal.
(reply) We think not - All as explained and apologised for ad nauseum in correspon- dence to date. Can it get more pathetic than nitpicking on a ruddy website? Initially you thought it a great idea, then changed your mind stating it’s useless etc
In pursuit of taking advantage of their position, the two Directors owning flat 6 & 7 took the liberty of refurbishing their respective flats outside working hours as well as