Page 6 - 22_PBC to Begg MH letter OCR_27-5-16 (7)

on a Sunday (this was acknowledged by Mr PBC himself). This was brought to my attention by my tenant (who was unable to revise for her exam until late in the evening), as well by other leaseholders. Mr PBC and his other Director are in breach of the head lease (and their own lease). They frequently use the outside common parts to dump their own personal building materials which is stored there or in the common parts.
(reply) We think not - and the particular example you are stating is as ever totally incorrect as indeed when young Gabriel came up to request I cease the drilling was around 4.50pm on a weekday (not Sunday) in the afternoon and I explained that works could progress until 6.30pm but I would cease due to his concerns. Why is it you make such misleading malicious accusations which can be so easily disproved - shall I get Gabriel to confirm? Shall I get Stella to confirm, as well as you having given her permission to install a satellite dish despite your quite unbelievable denial?
It was Flat 2, not 6. No work was done on Sunday in mine or Flat 2’s flat and why you should say that I acknowledged work was done on a Sunday I have no idea - if only you had some proof of your silly accusations it would add some credence to your accusa- tions - you will note that all our denials to date have been accompanied by irrefutable evidence, not hearsay, gossip, tittle-tattle and lies, lies and more damn lies!
(reply) All as explained ad nauseum in correspondence to date -
Endless wrongdoings could be listed but I will conclude with the fact that Mr PBC has recently intentionally damaged the door of my flat (which is private) by sticking irrelevant notices up with industrial tape. When pulled off they removed the varnish from the door. With Mr PBC's extensive property development knowledge, I am certain he anticipated this result. Subsequently he will be fully responsible and liable for the cost of the repair. This is a very aggressive form of communication when the letter could just as easily been put through the letter box. Unfortunately Mr PBC is accustomed to this type of aggressive behaviour.
(reply) We think not - well this takes the candle - firstly our work is substandard now it’s “With Mr PBC's extensive property development knowledge” - if proof were ever needed of your paranoia it has to this new line of attack, another complaint, another waste of time. If sellotape is now considered a lethal weapon, suggest you contact the manufacturers, you’ll make a fortune.
And damage to your door? Are you serious? - it would be totally 100% impossible to do further retribution to your door or it’s fitments as the door and the fitments are in an appalling state of disrepair as you are well aware?
It was a scribbled note with a 2cm bit of sellotape to attach to (admittedly) your thor- oughly unloved, old, still marked from when a previous tenant punched a hole through the wood (yes I witnessed it whilst he tried to break in to attack his ladyfriend 20 years ago - yet the door remains in an appalling state when viewed against the new decor and how you have the nerve to criticise the new decor God only knows - and how you are able to let a property for £600 a week with tarnished, almost 100 year old rotten furniture beggars belief. It was to request your tenants to not simply throw large boxes into the dustbins but break them down or else the bins overflow to the detriment of other neighbours and lessees as Flat 4, Dr Riad will be the first to confirm.