Page 75 - AAR 2018
P. 75

Table of Contents

         o Major Action Steps: (1) Distribute the Academic Achievement and Growth Report to the teachers and
              have them revisit their content and grade level results and action steps; (2) Locate specific areas of
              content focus within the unit-based curriculum for analysis; (3) Identify potential modifications to
              learning goals and/or learning activities to strengthen learning; (4) View individual student achievement
              and predicted performance reports to plan for students and flexible groups in lesson design; (5) Identify
              resources to support students’ needs from approved resources across Tiers 1-3 in MTSS; and (6) Monitor
              performance in specific focus areas on a regular basis and through collaboration with grade level and/or
              same course teachers and embedded formative assessment probes.

● Continue using STAR 360 reading as a predictor of student performance on the PSSA given a year of
    data to start correlations to standardized testing scores and ensure alignment, effectiveness, and
    integration of the MTSS resources and process.
         o Key Personnel: Administration, ALCs, District Data Team, MTSS Building Teams, Teachers
         o Timeline (Anticipated Start/Finish): November 2018 - Ongoing
         o Major Action Steps: (1) Re-examine benchmark criteria; (2) Determine most effective instructional
              planning tools and reports within the system; (3) Ensure integration of the STAR 360 reading data with
              the MTSS decision trees and instructional programming; (4) Provide time in the schedule for
              interventions to occur at each grade span outside of the core content time; and (5) Utilize the PA-
              Standards aligned norms to begin predicting student performance.

● Expand the use of ELA curricular materials, including the intervention resources (e.g. Wonder Works),
    ensuring fidelity and best practices in implementation (e.g. independent cold read v.s. teacher read-aloud
    for comprehension checks; use of grade level materials for instruction and assessment unless a student
    has a formally documented need within an IEP).
         o Key Personnel: Principals, Director of Special Education and Student Services, Building-Based MTSS
              Teams, Intervention Specialist, K-6 teachers
         o Timeline (Anticipated Start/Finish): November 2018 – June 2018
         o Major Action Steps: (1) Utilize professional learning communities to explore the intervention resources
              within our textbook and ancillary resources with which it came for both remediation and extension; (2)
              Share findings and recommendations with all grade level teachers; (3) Ensure staff members are able to
              leverage the technological resources and set parameters to support student needs; and (4) Determine
              effectiveness of resources and share feedback within the professional learning communities to ensure
              cyclical improvement of practice.

● Develop a systematic, integrated, and progressive approach to text-dependent analysis instructional
    strategies and feedback provision, beginning to develop students’ capacity as early as grade one and
    building upon the necessary skills at each grade level.
         o Key Personnel: ALCs, ELA Administrators, K-12 ELA Teachers
         o Timeline (Anticipated Start/Finish): December 2018 – March 2019
         o Major Action Steps: (1) Identify a core team of ELA teachers and administrators to engage in professional
              development; (2) Develop a checklist/model for students to use when responding to TDAs to ensure
              inclusion of all components; (3) Utilizing a train-the-trainer model, the core team will create a training
              session for ELA teachers by grade level including the progression of skills and checklist/model; (4)
              Create common rubrics to assess TDAs within each grade level incorporating grade -specific skills; (5)
              Utilize common rubrics to assess students’ writing and provide individualized feedback; and (6) Engage
              ELA teachers in exchanging best instructional practices based on their results, learning from research, and

                                                                                                                                                           75
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80