Page 385 - V3
P. 385

Sefer Chafetz Chayim
                                 Hilchot Esurei Lashon Hara
                                   Kelal Yud  -  Halachah 14


                the presence of three people.”  It goes without saying that if this speaker
                himself first reprimanded “this person” and he refused to accept the rebuke,
                in this circumstance disclosing what had happened “in the presence of
                                                           th
                three people” is not needed as I wrote above in the 15  notation.  But even
                if this speaker did not first reprimand “this person” because he assessed
                “this person” and concluded he would not accept rebuke, still it seems to
                me this speaker would not have to disclose his comments “in the presence
                of three people” because here Rabbeinu Yonah’s reason (for the leniency
                of “three people”), as he expresses it in section #228) is not applicable, that
                society will not suspect the speaker of being a flatterer or a liar since they
                see his sole intention in telling his story is only to reach a useful outcome
                as I wrote above.




                              Daily Halacha: Leap Year- 26 Kislev, 6 Nissan, 16 Av
                                      Mekor Hachayim

                K10/14.  However, people must be very, very careful in using this
                leniency (telling others about the harm done by “this person” to
                others or to the speaker himself) not to neglect any of the details
                of the seven rules brought at the beginning of this Kelal.  Because
                if they are not especially careful, it will be so easy for them to be   VOL-3
                trapped by their Yetzer Hara and become habitual speakers of Lashon
                Hara in violation of strict Torah law, all because they misapplied the
                leniency described above.  Because it is so easy to fall into Lashon   13
                Hara , I am going to explain again here all of the rules described
                above (that would permit this leniency) and add some additional
                details.    These  rules  in  summary  are  as  follows:    After  he  (the
                speaker) knows (36)  that his fellow Jew has still not changed his
                attitude in the issue between them and the speaker’s intention is to
                achieve a useful  outcome, as we explained, it is permissible to tell
                others what happened as long as these following conditions are not
                omitted:

                The First Condition: The speaker must have seen the event himself
                and not that he came to know about it because he heard it from
                someone  else.    (Because  if  this  was  not  the  case) Although  the




        375
      volume 3
   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390