Page 39 - VOL-2
P. 39

Mekor Hachayim                                 Sefer Chafetz Chayim
                                           Hilchot Esurei Lashon Hara

                                                          Kelal Dalet

                      Be'er Mayim Chayim on page 205

                    K4/8. When Beit Din instructs a person (33) in a particular way

                    that involves a physical action (34), whether it relates to this person
                    in his relationship with G‑d or to his interpersonal relationship with
                    others and this person absolutely refuses to abide by the Beit Din’s
                    instructions and gives no reason why he won’t comply, then it is
                    permissible to publicly humiliate him for his actions and even to
                    record his evil lifestyle in the community’s archives for all future
                    generations to view. But if this person responds with a defense that
                    justifies his refusal to comply in a framework of reasons that are
                    personal, then the law is as follows: If we believe that the reason he
                    gave for not complying is untrue and was offered only in an attempt
                    to convince the Beit Din to drop the matter, then we do not have to
                    believe him and it is permissible to denigrate him (35) and to make
                    his shameful behavior a matter of public record, as was described
                    above. But if we are unsure of the truthfulness of his reasons for
                    refusing to comply, then it is forbidden to shame or humiliate him.

                      Be'er Mayim Chayim on page 213

                    K4/9. And now we return to the opening subject of this Kelal.

                    From what we wrote (36) at the beginning of this section we can
                    learn that it is forbidden to denigrate one’s fellow Jew and talk
                    about aspects of his personality that are shameful. For example,
                    that he is haughty or is quick to fly into a rage (37) at the least
                    provocation or other bad character traits, that most certainly this is
                    denigration even though the facts are true. Who knows, perhaps he
                    did Teshuvah and he is saddened and his heart is embittered because
                    of those bad personality traits.

                    And even if one sees this person continue those bad traits and is
                    not at all remorseful because of them, nevertheless it is forbidden
                    to disclose and ridicule him because maybe this person does not
                    understand (38) the seriousness of the esur he is committing (each
                    time he expresses one of those bad traits). Because truthfully
                    speaking, we often see people, even men who are learned in Torah,

                    27

                volume 2
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44