Page 36 - TPA Jourtnal September October 2023
P. 36

lawfulness of her arrest.She also cited the Fourth   Defendant opened the door; (8) Fajkus testified the
        Amendment and Article 1, Section 9 of the Texas      defendant was not driving or doing anything to
        Constitution.During the hearing, the parties         operate the vehicle; (9) Fajkus testified that she had
        focused on whether Officer Brasuell had probable     no idea how long the Defendant had
        cause tobelieve that  Appellee had driven her        been at the school pickup line. When she first saw
        vehicle to the elementary school while she was       the Defendant,they were all at a standstill. There
        intoxicated. In closing arguments, the State         was already a line in front andbehind her;
        brieflymentioned Article 14.01(b) of theTexas Code   (10) Fajkus told officer Brasuell that she had
        of Criminal Procedure dealing with warrantless       notseen   the    Defendantdriving    that   day;
        arrests. Appellee in her closing arguments cited the  (11) Fajkus testified that at the time when she
        Fourth  Amendment, the Fourteenth  Amendment,        approached theDefendant’s vehicle, the children
        Article I,Section 9 of the Texas Constitution, and   had not yet been released fromschool, but recalled
        Article 38.23 of the  Texas Code of Criminal         they were released a few minutes later.  There
        Procedure.  The trial court granted  Appellee’s      were quite a few people going around
        motion to suppress and adopted  Appellee’s           thedefendant.  The cars werebumper to bumper;
        proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.    (12) Only  April 20, 2019 Tasha Luce, teacher at
        The trial court made the followingfindings of fact:  Humble ISD, waspresent at the school pickup line;
                                                             (13) Luce testified that she approached the
                                                             Defendant’s vehicle where she observed the
        (1) On  August 20, 2019, around 3:15 p.m.,           Defendant to be out of her car, standing with Fajkus
        AshleyFajkus was in a car with hercousin Danny       and [Fajkus’s cousin] behind the Defendant’s car;
        when they drove past an elementary school. She       (14) Luce approached the car to offer her assistance
        observed theDefendant because her neck was at an     to move the car inorder to avoid blocking the
        odd angle;(2) The Defendant was in her vehicle, in   pickup line traffic; (15) Luce testified that the
        a longschool pickup line,located in the far-right    Defendant was not driving the vehicle at the
        lane of a public roadway.  The whole right           time she approached, and was not sure how long
        lane is taken up right before the light for the school  the Defendant had been in the school pickup line;
        line to pick upkids;(3) Fajkus said the car was in   (16) Luce stated that Defendant was polite when
        park when she approached the vehicle.She             she approached the scene. When Luce offered to
        believed the Defendant was having a medical          move the car for the Defendant, she
        emergency suchas a diabetic issue; (4) Fajkus had    said sure and got into the passenger seat. Luce then
        no medical training other than some training in      drove the defendant in her car over to the nearby
        highschool where she was part of a group of          daycare; (17) After she moved the car, Luce kept the
        students that trained withthe doctors and nurses at  Defendant’s keys to her car; (18)  The fire
        Kingwood Medical Center;(5) Once Fajkus and          department arrived and checked the Defendant for
        Danny stopped to investigate, Fajkus ran to the      any medical issues, while waiting for the police to
        defendant’s vehicle and tried to open her car door.  arrive; (19) The police arrived about 10 minutes
        The defendant’scar doors were all locked, and all of  after the fire department. When he arrived, Officer
        the car windows were up.Fajkus then began            Richard Brasuell saw the Defendant sitting outside
        pounding on the defendant’s car window,              of her car; (20) Officer Brasuell is a Houston Police
        withoutresponse;(6) Fajkus pounded on the            Officer with three years’ experience; (21) Officer
        defendant’s vehicle doorand window until             Brasuell testified that he has made about 15 to 20
        another person in the pick-up line began calling     DWI arrests, but none since he arrested the
        911.  As soon as 911was called, the defendant        Defendant; (22) Officer Brasuell received a call for
        woke up and opened the car door, andasked Fajkus     a person down in a vehicle; (23)  When he
        to drive her home; (7) Fajkus said she smelled       approached the scene, he observed the Defendant
        alcohol coming from the vehicle, when the            sitting       outside        her        vehicle;




        29                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41