Page 40 - TPA Jourtnal September October 2023
P. 40

ELEMENTS – Family violence assault.                  Appellant went into the bathroom and Melendez
                                                             heard him cock his handgun. He then came out
        EVIDENCE – What is a serious bodily injury from a    and began shooting at Melendez and the man.
        gunshot?                                             Melendez tried to run to the kitchen, but Appellant
                                                             shot her through the back of her right thigh. She
        In January 2019, a jury convicted Appellant Vital    was able to remain standing and made her way to
        Garcia of first-degree aggravatedassault on a family
        member resulting in serious bodily injury for        the kitchen.
        shooting his then girlfriend with a firearm.  The    Appellant then fired at the man, who jumped
        question we must answer is whether the court of      through the second-floor balcony window to
        appeals improperly acted as a thirteenth juror by    escape.   Appellant turned his focus back to
        concluding that the evidence was insufficient for    Melendez and trapped her in the kitchen. He told
        the jury to find that the two gunshot wounds         her he was going to kill her, and she believed that
        inflicted on the victim caused serious bodily injury,  he would.  Appellant then shot Melendez in the
        namely, because neither bullet hit a vital organ.    right side of her chest from a close distance and
        Here, the evidence presented to the jury             fled from the apartment.
        demonstrated that the victim sustained two gunshot
        wounds to her thigh and chest; she suffered
        significant bleeding to the point that she blacked   Melendez was bleeding, but conscious. She
        out and believed she would die; her injuries were    testified that she did not call 911 because she was
        described as “deep lacerations” which required       in shock. Instead, she grabbed her keys, phone,
        twelve surgical staples to close; and her treating   and wallet and went to her car, thinking she could
        physician believed that her wounds constituted       make it to the hospital. Melendez drove one or two
        “serious bodily injury.” Considering the cumulative  blocks when she saw a police car on the side of the
        force of the evidence and allowing the drawing of    road. Realizing that she would not be able to make
        reasonable inferences, we conclude that the          it to the hospital on her own, she pulled over and
        evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s finding  asked the officer for help. The officer then called for
        that the victim faced a substantial risk of death as a  an ambulance. Melendez testified that the last
        result of her injuries. Therefore, the court of appeals  thing she remembers before blacking out is
        erred by concluding that the jury acted irrationally  entering the ambulance. She told the jury that she
        in finding that the victim suffered serious bodily   thought she was going to die. There was also
        injury. We reverse the lower court’s judgment and    testimony from a security guard for the apartment
        remand for further proceedings.                      complex who saw Melendez trying to drive away
                                                             from the scene. The security guard stopped her and
        Appellant and Marissa Melendez were in a             told her she was “bleeding” and needed to wait for
        romantic relationship and shared an apartment in     him to call an ambulance. He then got into the car
        Houston. At the time of the offense, they had been   with her. He testified that she was “driving with one
        dating for a little less than a year. The relationship  hand” while applying pressure to one of her
        started off fine but soon took a turn for the worse  gunshot wounds with the other hand. He
        when  Appellant became physically and verbally       eventually got out of the car when she stopped to
        abusive.  Appellant frequently threatened to kill    seek help from a police officer on the side of the
        Melendez if she ever cheated or left him. Because    road.
        Appellant carried a loaded .40 caliber handgun
        with him “24/7,” Melendez believed his threats and   The Houston Fire Department (HFD) responded to
        was afraid of him.                                   assist Melendez. HFD emergency medical records
                                                             indicate that Melendez was “ambulatory on scene”
                                                             and “conscious and alert” when HFD arrived. The
        On May 25, 2016,  Appellant came home early          records note that Melendez appeared to have
        from    work    to   find   Melendez    smoking      gunshot wounds to her right breast and right upper
        marijuana in the living room with a male friend.

        33                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45