Page 60 - SEPT OCTOBER 2019_PJ - Final_Neat
P. 60

to support the judgment of official oppression      Although      Ross raises several arguments to
        because the district court’s Order in  Aid of       support her petition, we will focus on the argument
        Investigation did not authorize the search of the   that the State’s evidence was insufficient to prove
        kitchen. The  court of appeals concluded that,      beyond a reasonable doubt that Ross knew her
        once Ross entered the home and determined that      conduct was unlawful.
        the child was not there, the search of the kitchen
                                                            To support the allegation that Ross knew her
        was outside the scope of what was authorized by
                                                            conduct was unlawful the State presented the
        the court order, making the search “unlawful.”
                                                            following evidence: (1) testimony and exhibits
        After addressing Ross’s other points of error, the
                                                            reflecting the training Ross received regarding the
        court of appeals upheld her conviction for
                                                            Fourth Amendment, (2) the journal and calendar
        official oppression.   We granted review to
                                                            found in the bedroom indicating that the baby had
        address whether the court of appeals erred by
                                                            been born in there, and (3) testimony by Francis
        holding that the evidence was legally sufficient
                                                            that Ross stated that she was searching the kitchen
        to prove that Ross knew her search was
                                                            to find evidence of drug use. Under these facts, we
        unlawful.
                                                            hold that this evidence was insufficient to prove
        When reviewing a legal sufficiency challenge,       beyond a reasonable doubt that Ross knew that her
        we view all of the evidence in the light most       conduct was unlawful.
        favorable to the verdict to determine whether
                                                            The court order obtained by Ross allowed her to
        “any rational trier of fact could have found the
                                                            enlist the help of law enforcement to enter the
        essential elements of the crime beyond a
                                                            home and locate the child “by any means
        reasonable doubt.”  The key question in this case
                                                            necessary.” It allowed her to search “the premises”
        is whether the evidence presented supports the
                                                            to locate the newborn child and observe “where
        conclusion that Ross committed every essential
                                                            the alleged abuse or neglect occurred.” When Ross
        element of the crime of official oppression.





































        56                www.texaspoliceassociation.com  •  866-997-8282              Texas Police Journal
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65