Page 33 - 2023 May June TPA Journal_Neat
P. 33

Joe C. Tooley, Legal Digest Editor
                         Joe C. Tooley, Attorneys & Counselors, Rockwall, Texas
                               www.TooleyLaw.com                    972-722-1058


             TEXAS POLICE ASSOCIATION


                                    LEGAL DIGEST




                                          May - June  2023


       AUTHOR’S NOTE:  It is the goal of this submission to extract those portions of relevant appellate
       opinions or the syllabus of the legal reporter which bear directly upon law enforcement methods
       and provide guidance for officers on an operational level. Much of the information pertaining to
       these cases is lifted verbatim from the court opinion or syllabus with independent analysis inserted
       as appropriate.  Due to clarity for training purposes, the distinction between quotes from the
       opinions and inserted analysis is not always identified and legal citations within the opinion are
       often omitted.  Emphasis is placed upon reported decisions from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
       and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.



        BRADY CASE -- Conviction dismissed for               County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to
                                                             the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County to
        Brady violation.
                                                             answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The
        Applicant was convicted of unlawful possession of    trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant
        a firearm by a felon and sentenced to three years’   within ten days from the date of this Court’s
        imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.      mandate.
        Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas
        corpus in the county of conviction, and the district  Dissent by J. Yeary:       Today the Court
        clerk forwarded it to this Court.                    concludes that Applicant’s guilty plea was entered
                                                             involuntarily, and it grants him a new trial. I
        Applicant contends, among other things, that his     disagree with that disposition and think that we
        plea was involuntarybecause it was induced by        should remand the cause for additional fact
        material misrepresentations by law enforcement       development relating to Applicant’s claim that his
        officers in their probable cause affidavit and       guilty-plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance
        incident reports that the search and subsequent      in counseling him to accept the plea though a basis
        discovery of the firearm in Applicant’s hotel room   existed to suppress crucial state’s evidence in the
        were done legally. Based on the record, the trial    case. But because I would not grant Applicant a
        court has determined that Applicant’s plea was       new trial at this point, without a complete record
        involuntary.                                         on Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel
                                                             claim, I respectfully dissent.
        Relief is granted. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S.
        742 (1970). The judgment in cause number F-20-       Called to a motel at which gunshots had been
        60819-V in the 292nd District Court of Dallas        reported in a hallway, police officers found shell




        28                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38