Page 35 - 2023 May June TPA Journal_Neat
P. 35

In United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622 (2002), it    Rather than to grant Applicant relief on his claim
        held that the failure to disclose evidence that would  that his guilty plea was involuntary, I would
        have served to impeach a state’s witness, had the    remand the cause for further fact development of
        case gone to trial, did not render the guilty plea so  his ineffective assistance of guilty-plea counsel,
        uninformed as to affect the voluntariness of the     and for recommended findings of fact and
        plea. “To the contrary, this Court has found that the  conclusions of law with respect to that issue from
        Constitution, in respect to a defendant’s awareness  the convicting court. I respectfully dissent.
        of relevant circumstances, does not require
        complete knowledge of the relevant circumstances,    Ex Parte Yearling, No. WR-93,662-01, Ct. Crim
        but permits a court to accept a guilty plea, with is  App.  May 25, 2022.
        accompanying waiver of various constitutional
                                                             ****************************************
        rights, despite various forms of misapprehension
                                                             ****************************************
        under which a defendant might labor.”  Among the
        examples the Supreme Court gave of circumstances
        about which a defendant who pleads guilty need       SEARCH & SEIZURE – Border search
        not be aware is that the admissibility of his out-of-
        court confession could have been challenged in       Following a bench trial, appellant Julio Cesar
        court.                                               Tenorio was convicted of smuggling bulk cash in
                                                             violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5332.  Tenorio appeals his
        Here, while Applicant may have been unaware of       conviction and sentence, arguing that the district
        the existence of the body cam video when he          court erred in denying his motion to suppress
        entered his guilty plea, he was present when the     evidence obtained from a stop and search at the
        police officers re-entered his motel room without a  border as he was leaving the United States and
        warrant, and so he was aware of the circumstance     attempting to enter Mexico. We AFFIRM.
        that might have rendered admission of the gun at a
        subsequent trial challengeable. That Applicant’s     On June 13, 2019, Tenorio drove a Chevrolet Tahoe
        lawyer may not have discovered enough about the      to the port of entry in Del Rio, Texas, on the U.S.-
        case to recognize the Fourth  Amendment              Mexico border. Customs and Border Protection
        significance of that circumstance before advising    (“CBP”) officers stopped Tenorio’s vehicle in the
        him to plead guilty seems to me to be a matter of    outbound lane, and Tenorio told the officers that he
        the potential ineffectiveness of his counsel, not the  was leaving the country and traveling to Mexico.
        voluntariness of his plea. To me, this case sounds   Tenorio declared that he did not have any weapons
        an awful lot like Richardson.                        or ammunition and that he had $3,200 in U.S.
                                                             currency. CBP officer Eric Medina testified that
        What is more, Ruiz also held that due process does   Tenorio “appeared nervous” during the encounter
        not even require the Government to disclose          and “began to have a facial twitch” “as soon as
        evidence of which it is aware at the time of a guilty  [they] started talking about the currency.”
        plea that would establish that the accused may have
        an affirmative defense to prosecution or that a      He further testified that when another officer began
        witness may be impeached.  That being so, it is      a spot check of the vehicle with a canine, Tenorio
        hard to imagine how an accused’s ignorance of a      “kept looking back towards the canine to see what
        potential Fourth Amendment basis to challenge the    the canine was doing.”  According to Medina,
        admissibility of evidence in court could prove fatal  because of  Tenorio’s nervous demeanor, his
        to the voluntariness of his guilty plea. The Court   indication that he was traveling from the United
        does not explain why it should in its per curiam     States to Mexico, and the fact that the canine
        opinion today.                                       “showed some interest” in the vehicle, officers
                                                             asked him to pull his vehicle over. Tenorio pulled



        30                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40