Page 42 - TPA Journal May June 2025
P. 42

EVIDENCE – MIRANDA                                   then drove with L.R. for three or four days to
                                                             Louisiana.  Sanders stopped in a remote area that
         Thomas Steven Sanders was convicted of kidnap-      was not far from his childhood home, and he fatal-
        ping and murdering a twelve-year-old child and       ly shot L.R. four times in the head and chest
        received two concurrent sentences of death. In this  before slitting her throat.  Sanders left L.R.’s body
        direct criminal appeal, Sanders brings numerous      in the woods.  The record reflects that approxi-
        challenges to his convictions and sentences. On      mately a month later, hunters discovered L.R.’s
        December 23, 2024, then-President Biden com-         remains.
        muted Sanders’s sentences to two terms of life       In the meantime, Suellen’s family notified author-
        imprisonment without the possibility of parole.      ities that Suellen and L.R. were missing after they
        That action did not necessarily moot the issues      did not return home to Las Vegas.  Subsequently,
        Sanders has raised in his appeal. We now vacate      on November 14, 2010, the authorities apprehend-
        Sanders’s conviction and sentence under Count        ed Sanders,  and he confessed to killing both
        Two of his indictment, which was based on 18         Suellen and L.R.
        U.S.C. § 924(c) and (j), and we otherwise affirm     Sanders was prosecuted by federal authorities
        the district court’s judgment.                       under federal law. In 2014, after a four-day trial in
                                                             the Western District of Louisiana, a jury convict-
        In 2010, Suellen Roberts and her twelve-year-old     ed Sanders of kidnapping and murdering twelve-
        daughter, L.R., moved in with Suellen’s mother,      year-old L.R.   After a seven-day penalty phase
        who lived in a one-bedroom apartment in Las          trial, the jury determined “by unanimous vote that
        Vegas.  Suellen rented a storage unit at Pacific     a sentence of death shall be imposed” on both
        Mini-Storage to store some of her belongings.        counts.   Pursuant to the jury’s verdict, the district
        Sanders worked and lived at the Pacific Mini-        court imposed two concurrent death sentences.
        Storage facility, and it was there that Suellen met  This direct appeal follows in which Sanders pre-
        Sanders.  During the summer of 2010, Suellen vis-    sents several issues.
        ited the storage facility two or three times a week.
        Sanders and Suellen began dating and would often     (Discussion of competency to stand trial is omit-
        go out together.  Late that summer, the two started  ted. Ed.)
        planning a Labor Day weekend trip to  Arizona
        with L.R.  Shortly before the trip, Sanders pur-     Sanders contends that the district court erred in
        chased ammunition for a .22 caliber rifle.           denying his motion to suppress the statements that
        The three left Las Vegas in Suellen’s vehicle and    he made during custodial interrogation following
        visited various attractions in  Arizona over the     his arrest. He argues that the law enforcement
        Labor Day weekend.                                   officers should have stopped questioning him
        On Monday, they began their trip home to Las         when he invoked his right to counsel.  Sanders’s
        Vegas.  In response to questioning, Sanders pro-     briefing seems to focus on the penalty phase of his
        vided the following account. En route, they were     trial to the exclusion of the guilt/innocence phase.
        driving “down the road and found a place to go       The commutation of his death sentences would
        shooting the gun.”  Suellen was “learn[ing] how to   seem to moot his complaints about the admission
        shoot his .22” rifle.  After Sanders and Suellen had  of the evidence that is in contention. But, out of an
        been shooting the rifle, Sanders fatally shot        abundance of caution, because he did not clearly
        Suellen in the head at close range and left her body  forfeit or affirmatively waive the applicability of
        where       they     had      been     shooting.     his arguments to his convictions, as opposed to his
         There is no evidence of an argument or altercation  sentences, and because he affirmatively seeks to
        prior to the shooting.  L.R. witnessed Sanders       have his convictions reversed, we proceed to
        shoot her mother and “was in hysterics.”  Sanders    address the denial of his motion to suppress. In




        38                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47