Page 28 - TPA Journal March April 2024
P. 28

Joe C. Tooley, Legal Digest Editor
                         Joe C. Tooley, Attorneys & Counselors, Rockwall, Texas
                               www.TooleyLaw.com                    972-722-1058


             TEXAS POLICE ASSOCIATION


                                    LEGAL DIGEST




                                        March - April 2024


       AUTHOR’S NOTE:  It is the goal of this submission to extract those portions of relevant appellate
       opinions or the syllabus of the legal reporter which bear directly upon law enforcement methods
       and provide guidance for officers on an operational level. Much of the information pertaining to
       these cases is lifted verbatim from the court opinion or syllabus with independent analysis inserted
       as appropriate.  Due to clarity for training purposes, the distinction between quotes from the
       opinions and inserted analysis is not always identified and legal citations within the opinion are
       often omitted.  Emphasis is placed upon reported decisions from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
       and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.



        ARREST – On View not always required.                arate occasions, petitions for discretionary review
                                                             were filed and denied twice at our Court, and the
        Can a peace officer legally arrest a suspect, with-  State’s petition for writ of certiorari was subse-
        out a warrant, for killing another person while dri-  quently denied at the United States Supreme
        ving intoxicated, even though the accident did not   Court. Appellee was tried and convicted on two
        occur in the officer’s presence?  Yes.  The  Texas   separate charges by a jury.  The conviction for
        Code of Criminal Procedure 14.03(a)(1) has been      felony murder was reversed by the First Court of
        interpreted to allow any peace officer to arrest a   Appeals and remanded for a new trial. The con-
        person found in a “suspicious place” and the cir-    viction for failure to stop and render aid was
        cumstances of the case reasonably show that the      affirmed by the First Court of Appeals and is not
        person is guilty of a felony or breach of the peace.  before this Court. This case has also been presided
        We find that the arrest met the requirements of this  over by seven successive trial judges. The original
        statute, and that the officer formed probable cause  judge on the case became ill prior to trial and
        to believe that both a felony and breach of the      another was recused in a contested motion to
        peace had occurred. Accordingly, we reverse the      recuse. There was no live testimony presented on
        court of appeals and the trial court’s suppression   the current issue before this Court; the trial judge
        of Appellee’s arrest and all evidence arising from   simply relied on the records and testimonies taken
        it and remand the case to the trial court for further  during prior pretrial proceedings and the jury trial.
        proceedings.                                         As a result, the transcripts of this proceeding had
                                                             to be supplemented. The latest ruling now before
        This case has travelled a long and convoluted jour-  this Court was made by Judge Brady Elliott who
        ney to reach this Court for the third time. Prior to
                                                             is no longer the judge of the 268th District Court.
        our Court granting review, this case has been        On remand, consequently, an eighth judge will
        before both Houston courts of appeals on four sep-


        24                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33