Page 68 - March April 2020 TPA
P. 68

The detectives witnessed Wise pretend to sleep on   “[a] public servant acting under color of [her]
        the Greyhound. Wise then produced a ticket with a   office or employment commits an offense if [she] . . .
        “very generic” name: “James Smith.” He denied       intentionally subjects another to . . . search [or]
        ownership of a backpack that was sitting next to his  seizure . . . that [she] knows is unlawful . . . .”).
                                                            Based upon our review of the record, viewing the
        own duffle bag. Yet, no other passengers sat near
                                                            evidence in the light most favorable
        the backpack.  The officers discovered that the
        backpack contained a substance they believed to be  to the verdict, we hold that the evidence was
                                                            insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
        cocaine. The detectives were aware that narcotics
                                                            beyond a reasonable doubt that Ross knew her
        traffickers often carry weapons. Evaluating the
                                                            conduct was unlawful, which is an essential
        totality of the circumstances, the detectives
                                                            element of the offense of official oppression. We
        established requisite suspicion to detain Wise for
        questioning and to request that he empty his        reverse the judgment of the court of
                                                            appeals and render a judgment of acquittal.
        pockets.
                                                            On December 12, 2011, the Department received a
        The district court erred in characterizing the bus
                                                            referral stating that a baby had just
        interdiction as an unconstitutional checkpoint stop.
                                                            been born at a two bedroom, one bath, mobile home
        Also,  Wise lacks standing to challenge the bus
        driver’s consent to the officers’ request to search the  to a mother who was using drugs during
                                                            her pregnancy. The report stated that the newborn
        Greyhound’s passenger cabin. Finding there is no
                                                            had not received any medical attention, and the
        other basis in the record to affirm the district court’s
                                                            mother had a previous child who was removed due
        ruling on the motion to suppress, we REVERSE the
                                                            to the mother’s drug use. Ross was assigned to the
        district court’s suppression order.
                                                            case on December 13, 2011.
        U.S. v. Wise, No.  16-20808, 5  th  Cir. Court of
                                                            After three days of searching databases and
        Appeals, Dec. 6 th  2017.                           conducting research to locate the mother and baby,
                                                            on December 15, 2011, Ross filed a Petition for
                                                            Orders in Aid of Investigation of a Report of Child
        OFFICIAL OPPRESSION – KNOWLEDGE                     Abuse or Neglect and For Temporary Restraining
        OF ILLEGALITY REQUIRED.                             Order. In her supporting affidavit, Ross reported
        In 2011  Appellant, Rebekah  Thonginh Ross,         what she had found through her investigation:
        worked as an investigator for the                   • The referral came to the Department on December
        Greenville office of the  Texas Department of       12, 2011, with very little information. Ross was
        Family and Protective Services (hereinafter         assigned to the case on December 13, 2011. The
        referred to as “the Department” or “CPS”). In 2015,  newborn’s parents were Leslie Avery Hunt Vargas
        she was convicted of the offense of official        (Hunt) and Nicholas Vargas (Vargas).
        oppression. The charge was based on an allegedly    • Ross learned that the mother (Hunt) was recently
        unlawful 1 search that Ross                         in jail for warrants but had been released.
        conducted pursuant to her duties as a CPS           • The baby was born at a mobile home owned by
        investigator. Ross’s conviction was affirmed by     the Vargas family located at 2321 Highway 69 S.,
        the Sixth Court of Appeals.2 We granted Ross’s      Greenville, Texas.
        petition for discretionary review to                • Ross and her supervisor, Natalie Ausbie Reynolds,
        determine whether the court of appeals correctly    went to the home on Highway 69 S. on or about
        held that the evidence was sufficient to            December 13, 2011, and smelled ammonia coming
        support Ross’s conviction.                          from inside. All of the blinds on the windows were
        1 TEX. PENAL CODE § 39.03(a)(1) (providing that     drawn.





        March/April 2020         www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140                         61
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73