Page 61 - Farm Bill Series_The 7 Things You Should Know
P. 61

“As we move toward a mark on the floor, I hope the issues of rice and peanuts will be given
               greater consideration,” Chambliss said during the markup. “If enacted under the current
               proposal, both peanuts and rice are going to take a huge hit.”

               Stabenow assured them considerations for Southern crops are already in the bill, including the
               Stacked Income Protection Plan for cotton.

               “It’s not about one region over another, but it is complicated,” she said. “We do have STAX for
               cotton, a new ag risk coverage program, special prices for rice and peanuts and new crop
               insurance options. I know this is not all fully developed. We realize we’re not there yet.”

               “We’ve known from the beginning as we moved away from direct payments that it would affect
               the South. This is not a bill without provisions for cotton, rice and peanuts,” Stabenow explained
               after the markup. “It’s a legitimate issue about transitioning.”

               Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., the other negative vote in the committee, drew back with
               concerns about the $4 billion in reductions to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
               (SNAP) spending.

               Near the end of June, Stabenow and Roberts thought they
               had more members on board for final passage of a bill, even
               though they still faced a few troublesome amendments.
               Chambliss of Georgia offered an amendment that would
               have required farmers purchasing crop insurance and
               receiving a premium subsidy to comply with strict soil
               conservation erosion standards, known as cross compliance.
               It’s not that Chambliss was a big fan of the idea, but he
               wanted to signal his dissatisfaction over Roberts’ support for
               commodity price protections that were in the bill. The
               amendment was narrowly approved, 52-47.
               But Stabenow and Roberts successfully passed a bill out of
               the Senate on June 21, with a strong 64-35 margin. Forty-six       Senator Saxby Chambliss, GA
               Democrats and 16 Republicans voted for the bill. Both Independents who caucus with the
               Democrats, Sens. Joe Lieberman, Conn., and Bernie Sanders, Vt., also voted for it.

               Southern Senators were still unhappy.

               Boozman, whose state of Arkansas is the nation's largest rice grower, said the Senate bill "will
               have a devastating impact on Southern agriculture." Chambliss, whose state of Georgia is the
               national leader in peanut production, complained it "shoehorns all producers into a one-size-fits-
               all policy" that would force farmers to switch to crops that enjoy better coverage for losses.

               Cochran of Mississippi issued a strong statement after the vote. “The ARC program will not
               sufficiently protect rice and other regional crops from price volatilities that pose less of a risk for
               commodities sustained by other government policies, such as renewable energy mandates. As
               such, the Senate bill does not afford these producers sufficient protection against long term,
               systemic price declines.

                                                     www.Agri-Pulse.com                                                                    59
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66