Page 45 - Diagnostic Radiology - Interpreting the Risks Part One

SVMIC Diagnostic Radiology: Interpreting the Risks

• The difficulty of use may distract radiologists from image

interpretation.

However, these are merely logistical problems; no specific legal
problems are anticipated with use of standardized templates or

RadLex.

A meticulous and well-written report is the best way for

radiologists to care for their patients. Furthermore, a well-
worded report can be the deciding factor in a successful

defense against a malpractice action. Even if a radiologist
identifies all the findings and makes a brilliant diagnosis,

deficient reporting and communication of the information can
result in a medicolegal debacle.

Communication is not limited to the written report.

Communication errors often occur during handoffs. This is
especially evident in the cardiac catheterization and endoscopy

labs, as well as the radiology imaging settings where healthcare
practitioners may administer medications such as contrast

media, adjust rates of fluids, and flush IV access lines. Continuity
of care is a frequent problem in a hospital setting.

What if the referring physician has signed out to someone else?
Or, what if the radiologist’s shift has ended and he or she must

pass off the responsibility? What is the timeframe for expecting
a response for an emergency department referral? When a call

is made to a referring physician, how is it documented? Let’s a
take a look at a case example.

Page 45