Page 42 - Part 1 Collaborating with Advanced Practice Providers - An Overview of State Rules
P. 42
SVMIC Collaborating with Advanced Practice Providers
licensure test for PAs four times. He denied during
depositions that he performed patient examinations.
The ED physician testified that he'd assumed the provider was
a licensed PA and that he didn't need to redo the history and
examination. The doctor and his medical group blamed each
other. The doctor said he would have redone the examination
if he'd known that the expediter was unlicensed. The medical
group's leader said it was the doctor's responsibility to ask the
expediter about his status. There had been no written
guidelines for what the he was authorized to do.
The jury was clearly outraged, finding that the group had tried
to conceal the APP's involvement from the plaintiffs and
placed profits over patient safety.
Physician Licensure and Similar Specialty
Every state within the SVMIC service area requires supervising or
collaborating physicians to have a current, unencumbered state
medical license. Further, physicians must normally be actively
engaged in patient care to be qualified to supervise and must have
experience or expertise in the same specialty of medicine as the
APP. For example, to be qualified to supervise an orthopedic
physician assistant or nurse practitioner, a physician must practice
within or have experience in orthopedics.
This is an important aspect of supervision and/or collaboration to
consider and understand. The Tennessee Board of Medical
Examiners addressed this concept and has provided a useful
example in an advisory ruling answering the question of whether a
Page | 42