Page 54 - JLA-03

¥ÿ≈æ“À

¢âÕ‡ πÕ·π–Àπ૬ߓπ„π°√–∫«π°“√¬ÿμ‘∏√√¡∑“ßÕ“≠“§«√®–μâÕß¡’π‚¬∫“¬

∑“ßÕ“≠“‰ª„π·π«‡¥’¬«°—π·≈–¡’°“√ª√– “πß“π°—πÕ¬à“߇ªìπ√–∫∫μàÕ‡π◊ËÕß √«¡∑—Èß
ª√—∫ª√ÿß·°â‰¢°ÆÀ¡“¬√–‡∫’¬∫§” —Ëß·≈–°“√ªØ‘∫—μ‘ß“π„Àâ Õ¥§≈âÕß°—∫«—μ∂ÿª√– ߧå„π°“√

≈ß‚∑…∑“ßÕ“≠“¡“°¬‘Ëߢ÷Èπ

§” ”§—≠ : °“√π”¢âÕ‡∑Á®®√‘߇°’ˬ«°—∫μ—«ºŸâ°√–∑”§«“¡º‘¥¡“„™â°”Àπ¥‚∑…

Abstract

Offenderûs relevant facts is an important factor for discretion of jail

sentence in appropriate with the offender himself. Nevertheless, practically,

there had still been some problem in applying those facts to the sentencing
of individual case, because of those facts insufficiency as the results have

shown that the sentences had not been effective in prevention and control of

the crimes.

This research is to study the aspects of the problems when applying

the offenderûs relevant facts to determine the sentences and to study the

theories and concepts relevant to jail sentencing process, as well as to find
the solutions on applying the offenderûs relevant facts for efficient court

discretion of jail sentencing.

The research methods for using qualitative research through existing

documentations containing Thai and foreign information in forms of books, text
books, reports, articles, orders, regulations, judgments, including other sources

of relevant information. All information is to be integrated for logical analysis

in comparison to foreign legal and punishment systems. The results shall be

concluded respectively.

44 ‡≈à¡∑’Ë Û ªï∑’Ë ˆˆ