Page 297 - วารสารกฎหมาย ศาลอุทธรณ์คดีชํานัญพิเศษ
P. 297

ฉบับพิเศษ ประจำ�ปี 2564



            manner. As this procedure is based on non-legally binding provisions, its purpose is not
            to ensure the application of a ratified Convention (i.e., Convention No.87 or No.98) but

            the observance of the “principle” on freedom of association enshrined in the Preamble
            of the Constitution. In other words, a preamble, a non-operational part of a treaty, is

            followed up by another set of legally non-binding machineries. Thus, the principle of
            freedom of association, one of the fundamental principles of ILS, is followed up by soft
            laws. We know that the procedure has accomplished a great deal of improvement in the

            last 70 years. Experience with the CFA procedure provides hope that observance of ILS
            can be achieved by “soft” means. Theoretically speaking, it is possible that a similar

            procedure could be designed for “principles” other than the principle of freedom of
            association,  by  setting  up  a  Committee  on  Forced  Labour  or  a  Committee  on
            Discrimination, for example. However, it would appear easier and quicker to entrust

            the task to an even softer means.


                           2. The Role of CSR to Make the Referenced

                                    Legal Instrument a Soft Law.



                    The last two decades saw a rapid growth in the implementation of corporate
            social responsibility (CSR) policies. The UN Human Rights Council’s resolution

            endorsing the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGP) is one of
                                                                            3
            the key documents, which has a relevance to the “soft” treatment of ILS. The UN General
            Assembly resolution adopting the Sustainable Development Goals  (SDGs) is yet another
                                                                          4
            more general, but key, document for discussion. In both documents, corporate entities
            are invited to take up the promotion of social justice at their own initiatives. The second

            of the three pillars of the UNGP, namely the “respect” of the human rights precept, is
            nothing but an invitation to exercise CSR in corporate activities. Goal No.17 on
            partnership of the SDGs is another part, which targets at corporate entities and invites

            them to achieve the goals (including social justice) on their own initiatives.



                    3  A/HRC/RES/17/4 (21 March 2011).
                    4  Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 18 September 2015, A/70/L.1.



                                                                                             295
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302