Page 166 - 111111

¥ÿ≈æ“À

À≈—°‰«â ·≈–‰¡à«à“ºŸâª√–°Õ∫∏ÿ√°‘®®–¡’°“√·∫àß·¬° ¿“æ∫ÿ§§≈ÕÕ°‡ªìπ°’ËÀπ૬°Áμ“¡ ·μàÀ“°

¡’§«“¡‡ªìπÀπ÷Ë߇¥’¬«°—π„π∑“ß∏ÿ√°‘®·≈â«°Á∂◊Õ«à“‡ªìπºŸâª√–°Õ∫∏ÿ√°‘®‡æ’¬ß√“¬‡¥’¬«μ“¡À≈—°
Àπ૬∏ÿ√°‘®‡¥’¬« (Single Economic Entity) ¥—ßπ—Èπ ‰¡à«à“Õߧå°√∏ÿ√°‘®„¥Ê ®–„™â«‘∏’∑“ß

°ÆÀ¡“¬„¥Ê °Áμ“¡„π°“√·∫àß·¬°°“√‡ªìπ ¿“æ∫ÿ§§≈ ·μàÀ“°¢âÕ‡∑Á®®√‘ߪ√“°Ø«à“¡’∫ÿ§§≈

‡∫◊ÈÕßÀ≈—߇ªìπºŸâ¡’Õ”π“®μ—¥ ‘π„®‡¥Á¥¢“¥ (decisive influence) °Á∂◊Õ«à“∫ÿ§§≈¥—ß°≈à“«‡ªìπ
à«πÀπ÷ËߢÕßÕߧå°√∏ÿ√°‘®´÷Ëß®–μâÕß√—∫º‘¥μ“¡°ÆÀ¡“¬·¢àߢ—π∑“ß°“√§â“ ‚¥¬μâÕß√—∫º‘¥

√à«¡°—π·≈–·∑π°—π (jointly and severally) ‡æ√“–∂◊Õ«à“∑ÿ°∫√‘…—∑¡’ ∂“𖇪ìπºŸâª√–°Õ∫

∏ÿ√°‘®√“¬‡¥’¬« (single undertaking) μ“¡°ÆÀ¡“¬·¢àߢ—π∑“ß°“√§â“

μ—«Õ¬à“ß∑’Ëßà“¬∑’Ë ÿ¥¢Õß°“√¡’Õ”π“®‡¥Á¥¢“¥π—Ëπ§◊Õ °“√¡’ÀÿâπÕ¬Ÿà„π∫√‘…—∑≈Ÿ°∑—ÈßÀ¡¥
(ÒÒ)
Ò ‡ªÕ√凴Áπμåπ—Èπ„Àâ —ππ‘…∞“π‰«â°àÕπ«à“ ∫√‘…—∑·¡à¡’Õ”π“®‡¥Á¥¢“¥‡Àπ◊Õ∫√‘…—∑≈Ÿ° À“°

∫√‘…—∑≈Ÿ°∑”º‘¥°ÆÀ¡“¬·¢àߢ—π∑“ß°“√§â“ ∫√‘…—∑·¡à°ÁμâÕß√à«¡√—∫º‘¥‡™àπ‡¥’¬«°—π Õ¬à“߉√°Á¥’
¢âÕ —ππ‘…∞“π¥—ß°≈à“«‡ªìπ¢âÕ —ππ‘…∞“π∑’ˉ¡à‡¥Á¥¢“¥ (rebuttable presumption) ∫√‘…—∑·¡à

“¡“√∂π” ◊∫À—°≈â“߉¥â«à“∫√‘…—∑≈Ÿ°μ—¥ ‘π„®Õ¬à“߇ªìπÕ‘ √–

Õ¬à“߉√°Á¥’ πÕ°®“° —¥ à«π°“√∂◊ÕÀÿâπ·≈â« ¬—ßμâÕßæ‘®“√≥“¢âÕ‡∑Á®®√‘ßÕ◊ËπÊ

ª√–°Õ∫«à“¡’∫ÿ§§≈Õ◊Ëπ —Ëß°“√„Àâ∑”º‘¥°ÆÀ¡“¬·¢àߢ—π∑“ß°“√§â“À√◊Õ‰¡à ¬°μ—«Õ¬à“߇™àπ
(ÒÚ)
„𧥒 Metsä-Serla Oyj ∫√‘…—∑ Finnboard ‡ªìπºŸâ°√–∑”º‘¥°ÆÀ¡“¬·¢àߢ—π∑“ß°“√§â“
·≈–¡’ªí≠À“„Àâ«‘π‘®©—¬μàÕ¡“«à“¡’ºŸâ√à«¡°√–∑”§«“¡º‘¥Õ◊ËπÕ’°À√◊Õ‰¡à ‚¥¬»“≈‰¥â«‘π‘®©—¬

‡π◊ÈÕÀ“¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫¢Õß∫√‘…—∑ Finnboard ´÷Ëß√–∫ÿ«à“∫√‘…—∑¡’«—μ∂ÿª√– ߧ墓¬°≈àÕß

°√–¥“… (carton board) ´÷Ëߺ≈‘μ‚¥¬∫√‘…—∑ Metsä-Serla Oyj ·≈–Õ◊ËπÊ (√«¡‡√’¬°«à“

ç°≈ÿࡺŸâ√âÕßé) ·≈–§≥–°√√¡°“√ (Board of Directors) ¢Õß Finnboard ®–μâÕß¡’μ—«·∑π
¢ÕߺŸâº≈‘μ°≈àÕß°√–¥“…√“¬≈–Õ¬à“ßπâÕ¬ Ò §π πÕ°®“°π’È ¢âÕ∫—ߧ—∫¬—ß√–∫ÿ¥â«¬«à“Àπ’È∑’Ë

Finnboard °àÕ¢÷Èππ—Èπ∫√‘…—∑ºŸâº≈‘μ°≈àÕß°√–¥“…®–μâÕß√à«¡°—π√—∫º‘¥‡ ¡◊Õπ‡ªìπÀπ’È¢Õß

(ÒÒ)
Case C-97/08 P Akzo Nobel NV and Others v Commission of the European Communities
[2009], para. 57-64.
(ÒÚ)
Case C-294/98 P Metsä-Serla Oyj, UPM-Kymmene Oyj, Tamrock Oy and Kyro Oyj Abp v
Commission of the European Communities [2000]. para. 27.

情¿“§¡ - ‘ßÀ“§¡ ÚıˆÚ 155
155
155
155
155