Page 15 - ดุลพาห เล่ม3.indd
P. 15

ดุลพาห




            connected.  In many cases, the applicable law predominantly depends on which
                       8
            state’s court asserts jurisdiction over the case and on which grounds the jurisdiction

            is established . However, the National Reform Plan has not provided any concrete
                         9
            guidelines concerning how jurisdictional rules in international disputes should be

            developed. This issue is left to the judiciary, the legislature, and relevant government
            agencies to decide in the subsequent implementation stage. The purposes of this

            article are to find a suitable approach towards the exercise of international
             jurisdiction by Thai courts over civil and commercial disputes with foreign elements

            and to propose a set of guidelines which could serve as a source of reference for
            future deliberations.


                     Part II illustrates the main features of jurisdictional rules in Thailand through
            a comparative analysis. In order to highlight the characteristics of international

            jurisdiction, the jurisdictional laws of Japan, the European Union (“EU”), and
            several other countries as well as international principles such as the 1999 Preliminary

            Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial
            Matters (“1999 Draft Hague Convention”) and the ALI / UNIDROIT Principles of

            Transnational Civil Procedure  are comparatively examined. Part III identifies
                                           10
            the interests of parties, the forum and international society which should motivate

            jurisdictional rules, and courts’ practices. Part IV suggests a path to the reform and
            modernization of international jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters. Part V

            concludes the article with a number of remarks.





            8.  Mary Keyes, “A Critical Analysis of Jurisdiction in International Litigation,” (Ph.D. diss., Griffith
              University, 2004), 405.
            9.  Jurcys, “Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property Disputes,” 175.
                  ê
            10. The ALI / UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure are jointly proposed by the American
              Law Institute (ALI) and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT)
              to be standards for adjudication of transnational commercial disputes. The aim of the Principles is to
              reconcile differences among various national rules of civil procedure, taking into account the peculiarities
              of transnational disputes as compared to purely domestic ones.



            4                                                                เล่มที่ ๓ ปีที่ ๖๕
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20