Page 19 - ดุลพาห เล่ม3.indd
P. 19

ดุลพาห




                     As for Korea, there are specific rules for international jurisdiction in the
            Private International Law Act of Korea (“KPILA”). Article 2 of the KPILA lays

            down general principles on international jurisdiction as follows:

                     “(1) The courts shall have international jurisdiction if the parties or the

                     case in dispute has a substantial connection with the Republic of Korea.
                     In determining whether or not such substantial connection exists, the courts

                     shall follow the reasonable principles in conformity with the ideas
                     underlying the allocation of international jurisdiction.

                     (2) The courts shall determine whether or not they have international
                     jurisdiction by reference to the provisions on jurisdiction of domestic laws,

                     having full regard for the special characteristics of international jurisdiction
                     in light of the provisions of paragraph (1).”


                     This provision acknowledges the special nature of international jurisdiction
            and requires Korean courts to take into account its special context in the

            determination of international jurisdiction, rather than assuming that the rules on
            international jurisdiction are equal to those of domestic jurisdiction provided in the

            Civil Procedure Act . Since 2014, Korean legislators have been working on a massive
                               23
            amendment to the KPILA to replace Article 2 with more concrete and detailed rules

            on civil, commercial and family matters to enhance legal certainty on adjudicatory
            jurisdiction in Korea .
                                24

                     On the other hand, the EU has adopted the Brussels I Regulation and its
            2012 revision (“Brussels I (recast)”)  to unify the rules of conflict for jurisdiction in
                                               25


            23. Hyun Suk Kwang, “Introduction of Detailed Rules of International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction in Korea:
              Proposed Amendments of the Private International Law Act,” Japanese Yearbook of Private International
              Law 19, (2017): 5.
            24. See “International Jurisdiction,” Ministry of Government Legislation of Korea, accessed January 31,
              2018, http://www.lawmaking.go.kr/ lmSts/govLmPln/1000000152422/2000000219907.
            25. Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012
              on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
              (recast), OJ2012, L 351/1.

            8                                                                เล่มที่ ๓ ปีที่ ๖๕
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24